Kassidy Schmitz

Associate | She/Her/Hers

Overview

Kassidy leverages her unique legal experience and education to deliver sophisticated counsel to patent clients. Her broad technical background makes her effective in a wide range of technology areas and industries, including electrical and mechanical engineering.

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Kassidy worked as a paralegal for an IP boutique firm, prosecuting design patents. During law school, she represented DC, Maryland, and Virginia-based entrepreneurs at the Glushko-Samuelson IP Clinic. She also interned at the Office of Unfair Trade Investigations at the International Trade Commission, as well as Unified Patents.

Kassidy is an associate in Crowell's DC office, where she focuses her practice on district court litigation, 337 investigations, and inter partes review proceedings.

Career & Education

|
    • The George Washington University, B.S., Mechanical Engineering
    • American University, J.D., 2022
    • The George Washington University, B.S., Mechanical Engineering
    • American University, J.D., 2022
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Kassidy's Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.13.24

The Federal Circuit Defines the “Public Disclosure” Exception to Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(2)

The Federal Circuit in Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Technology International Limited, Inc., No. 2023-1336 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2024) recently addressed the prior art exception of a “public disclosure” under 35 USC § 102(b)(2)(B).  Affirming a decision of the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”), the court held that “publicly disclosed” is only satisfied if the invention was made available to the public, and a non-confidential but otherwise private sale of an invention is not a sufficient “public disclosure”.  This case provides a cautionary tale that disclosing or selling an invention before filing a patent application is fraught with risk....

  • Publication | 2021

    “TRIPing Over Trade Secrets: How China’s Cyber Theft of U.S. Trade Secrets Violated TRIPS,” American University International Law Review, Volume 36, 2021.

  • Publication | 07.22.21

    “Denials of Transfer Motions in Western District of Texas and Mandamus Reversals by Federal Circuit,” Unified Patents – Insights

Insights

Publication | 2021

“TRIPing Over Trade Secrets: How China’s Cyber Theft of U.S. Trade Secrets Violated TRIPS,” American University International Law Review, Volume 36, 2021.

Publication | 07.22.21

“Denials of Transfer Motions in Western District of Texas and Mandamus Reversals by Federal Circuit,” Unified Patents – Insights
|

Kassidy's Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.13.24

The Federal Circuit Defines the “Public Disclosure” Exception to Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(2)

The Federal Circuit in Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Technology International Limited, Inc., No. 2023-1336 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2024) recently addressed the prior art exception of a “public disclosure” under 35 USC § 102(b)(2)(B).  Affirming a decision of the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”), the court held that “publicly disclosed” is only satisfied if the invention was made available to the public, and a non-confidential but otherwise private sale of an invention is not a sufficient “public disclosure”.  This case provides a cautionary tale that disclosing or selling an invention before filing a patent application is fraught with risk....

  • Publication | 2021

    “TRIPing Over Trade Secrets: How China’s Cyber Theft of U.S. Trade Secrets Violated TRIPS,” American University International Law Review, Volume 36, 2021.

  • Publication | 07.22.21

    “Denials of Transfer Motions in Western District of Texas and Mandamus Reversals by Federal Circuit,” Unified Patents – Insights