Andrew M. Spitzer
Overview
Andrew Spitzer is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Chicago office, where he splits his practice between the Patent and ITC Litigation and Patent Prosecution groups. His experience with patent litigation matters spans a variety of different industries, including pharmaceuticals, financial technology, hardware, and software.
Career & Education
- University of Notre Dame, B.S., magna cum laude, chemical engineering, 2018
- Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, J.D., cum laude, 2021
- Illinois
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Andrew's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.03.24
USPTO Embraces AI Tools in New Guidance
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its “Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States” in the Federal Register (the “Guidance”). As the title suggests, the document provides additional opinions and guidance from the USPTO on the use of AI tools for prosecuting patent and trademark applications before the USPTO.
Publication | 10.27.23
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.16.23
Open Questions Add Uncertainty to Scope and Impact of New Trade Secret Law
Recognition
- Julius H. Miner Moot Court Competition: Runner-Up
Andrew's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.03.24
USPTO Embraces AI Tools in New Guidance
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its “Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States” in the Federal Register (the “Guidance”). As the title suggests, the document provides additional opinions and guidance from the USPTO on the use of AI tools for prosecuting patent and trademark applications before the USPTO.
Publication | 10.27.23
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.16.23
Open Questions Add Uncertainty to Scope and Impact of New Trade Secret Law
Andrew's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.03.24
USPTO Embraces AI Tools in New Guidance
On April 11, 2024, the USPTO published its “Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the United States” in the Federal Register (the “Guidance”). As the title suggests, the document provides additional opinions and guidance from the USPTO on the use of AI tools for prosecuting patent and trademark applications before the USPTO.
Publication | 10.27.23
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.16.23
Open Questions Add Uncertainty to Scope and Impact of New Trade Secret Law