Labor Management Relations and Labor Disputes
Overview
Crowell & Moring has a national reputation in traditional labor law. We represent employers around the country in all types of disputes arising under the National Labor Relations Act, ranging from administrative procedures before the National Labor Relations Board to high-stakes litigation in federal and state courts. We also regularly represent employers in collective bargaining negotiations and grievance arbitration matters, and advise clients in developing and implementing strategies to prevent (or, if necessary, minimize the business impact of) strikes, lockouts or other work stoppages. We have successfully handled hundreds of union election proceedings involving employers across the country.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.16.24
Over the past several years, federal courts have increasingly questioned the authority of administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate alleged violations of certain labor and employment statutes. In the last several weeks, two U.S. district courts in Texas issued decisions halting unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the grounds that NLRB ALJs lack the constitutional authority to preside over such actions due to unconstitutional protections against their removal.[1] Similarly, the last year has seen several decisions by courts in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits finding that ALJs, whose decisions are not reviewable by a Presidential appointee, lack constitutional authority under the Appointments Clause to adjudicate claims.[2] The trend illustrated by these decisions, combined with the Supreme Court’s decision in June to abandon the Chevron doctrine of extending deference to federal agency rule-making proceedings, portend significant changes in the way employers interact with federal agencies that enforce labor and employment law.
Firm News | 8 min read | 08.15.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.29.23
NLRB Reverses Stance on the Effect of Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Independent Contractor Analysis
Insights
Litigation Forecast 2013: What Corporate Counsel Need to Know for the Coming Year
|01.31.13
Crowell & Moring LLP publication
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.16.24
Over the past several years, federal courts have increasingly questioned the authority of administrative law judges (ALJs) to adjudicate alleged violations of certain labor and employment statutes. In the last several weeks, two U.S. district courts in Texas issued decisions halting unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on the grounds that NLRB ALJs lack the constitutional authority to preside over such actions due to unconstitutional protections against their removal.[1] Similarly, the last year has seen several decisions by courts in the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits finding that ALJs, whose decisions are not reviewable by a Presidential appointee, lack constitutional authority under the Appointments Clause to adjudicate claims.[2] The trend illustrated by these decisions, combined with the Supreme Court’s decision in June to abandon the Chevron doctrine of extending deference to federal agency rule-making proceedings, portend significant changes in the way employers interact with federal agencies that enforce labor and employment law.
Firm News | 8 min read | 08.15.24
Firm News | 9 min read | 06.06.24
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.29.23
NLRB Reverses Stance on the Effect of Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Independent Contractor Analysis