Energy
Overview
Crowell & Moring's Energy Group offers a complete range of services to assist our clients in successfully navigating commercial, regulatory and policy challenges throughout the U.S. Our practice has both extensive capabilities and decades-long experience, particularly with respect to federal and state electric and gas regulation, infrastructure project development, financing and acquisition transactions, litigation, compliance, and enforcement matters.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.26.26
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, No. 24-1068, resolving a circuit split over whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state law failure-to-warn claims challenging EPA-approved pesticide labels. In a 7-2 opinion, the Court held that FIFRA expressly preempts state tort claims that would require a manufacturer to add or modify warnings on a pesticide label, at least where the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evaluated the relevant risk and approved the label, whether with warnings reflecting the agency’s assessment or without a corresponding warning.
Firm News | 7 min read | 06.04.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.14.26
Insights
EV charging stations & connectors: the importance of design patents
|11.15.24
EV Design & Manufacturing
Recent FTC Guidance On The Use Of Artificial Intelligence And Algorithms In The Age Of COVID-19
|09.01.20
The Computer & Internet Lawyer
Trends in Business and Human Rights Law in the Group of Seven (G7)
|08.01.20
Human Rights and Business Initiative, UC Berkeley
Baltimore Police Chief Apologizes, City Settles Harlem Park Lockdown Lawsuit
|06.29.21
The Daily Record
- |
06.28.21
WJZ CBS Baltimore
Army Office of Energy Initiatives Releases RFP for New Renewable Energy Project at Fort Hood
|10.23.14
Crowell & Moring's Government Contracts Legal Forum
Professionals
Partner
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.26.26
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, No. 24-1068, resolving a circuit split over whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state law failure-to-warn claims challenging EPA-approved pesticide labels. In a 7-2 opinion, the Court held that FIFRA expressly preempts state tort claims that would require a manufacturer to add or modify warnings on a pesticide label, at least where the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evaluated the relevant risk and approved the label, whether with warnings reflecting the agency’s assessment or without a corresponding warning.
Firm News | 7 min read | 06.04.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.14.26
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.26.26
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, No. 24-1068, resolving a circuit split over whether the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) preempts state law failure-to-warn claims challenging EPA-approved pesticide labels. In a 7-2 opinion, the Court held that FIFRA expressly preempts state tort claims that would require a manufacturer to add or modify warnings on a pesticide label, at least where the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evaluated the relevant risk and approved the label, whether with warnings reflecting the agency’s assessment or without a corresponding warning.
Firm News | 7 min read | 06.04.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.14.26
