Tyler A. O'Connor
Overview
Tyler O’Connor is an energy litigator and public policy leader in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, where he represents clients in the courts, in arbitration forums, and before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) and Department of Energy (“DOE”). His recent work includes advising companies on the Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, representing clients in rulemakings and on Capitol Hill, and litigating energy disputes at FERC. Washingtonian Magazine named Tyler one of the “500 Most Influential People Shaping Policy in Washington D.C.” in 2023.
Career & Education
- United States House of Representatives
Energy Counsel, House Energy and Commerce Committee, 2021–2022 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Law Clerk, 2014–2015
- United States House of Representatives
- Emory University, B.B.A., with distinction, 2011
- Emory University School of Law, J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, 2014
- District of Columbia
- Maryland
Tyler's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.24.25
On October 23rd, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) containing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANOPR”) with principles for all large load interconnections across the US, including those co-located with generating facilities.[1] Significantly, the Secretary of Energy states that the interconnection of large loads to the transmission system “falls squarely” within FERC’s jurisdiction, thus weighing in on a dispute that has been pending before FERC for over a year. This move appears to be a reaction to the continued pendency before FERC of the colocation dockets[2] and a technical conference on colocation held almost a year ago.[3]
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.03.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.03.25
Event | 09.24.25
Representative Matters
- Successfully representing an independent power producer in a multi-hundred-million-dollar power purchase agreement dispute with a large California utility.
- Securing multiple TROs in state court over the course of one month in bet-the-company litigation on behalf of a company that develops financial products for energy merchants and commodity trading firms.
- Successfully representing a battery storage developer in a FERC dispute involving PJM’s recalibration of its methodology for compensating energy storage projects.
- Successfully resolving numerous rate cases at FERC on behalf of Energy Group clients.
- Obtaining a significant damages award on behalf of a client in a multijurisdictional dispute involving breach of contract and allegations of fraud, ultimately resulting in a favorable global settlement for our client.
- Representing a pipeline in a non-public FERC Office of Enforcement investigation, which was resolved without any further action by the agency.
- Resolving claims by the DOE’s Office of Enforcement against manufacturing clients alleging violations of energy conservation standards under the Energy Policy Conservation Act.
- Securing victory in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on the theory that the government effectuated a taking of a real-estate developer’s property in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Tyler's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.24.25
On October 23rd, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) containing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANOPR”) with principles for all large load interconnections across the US, including those co-located with generating facilities.[1] Significantly, the Secretary of Energy states that the interconnection of large loads to the transmission system “falls squarely” within FERC’s jurisdiction, thus weighing in on a dispute that has been pending before FERC for over a year. This move appears to be a reaction to the continued pendency before FERC of the colocation dockets[2] and a technical conference on colocation held almost a year ago.[3]
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.03.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.03.25
Event | 09.24.25
Insights
- |
09.26.23
The Journal of Federal Agency Action
No so fast: The effect of congressional oversight on IRA implementation
|05.02.23
American Bar Association
No So fast: The Effect Of Congressional Oversight On IRA Implementation
|05.02.23
American Bar Association
Litigation Forecast 2017: What Corporate Counsel Need to Know for the Coming Year
|01.18.17
a Crowell & Moring LLP publication
American Law of Mining, 2nd Edition §§ 185-186
|01.01.15
Where Energy Policy Is Headed Next with Tyler O’Connor (Part 1)
|07.24.25
National Security Law Today (podcast)
Foes Of Biden’s Climate Plan Sought A ‘New Solyndra,’ But They Have Yet To Dig Up Scandal
|08.17.23
Inside Climate News
- |
08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
- |
08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
EPCA Compliance: What Appliance Manufacturers (and Importers) Need to Know
|02.21.19
Crowell & Moring's Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
Space Race Starts Anew as Virgin Galactic Files Trade Secrets Claims Against Rival
|10.20.16
Crowell & Moring's Trade Secrets Trends
Texas Supreme Court Issues First Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act Decision
|05.23.16
Crowell & Moring's Trade Secrets Trends
Recent Case Highlights Circuit Split on Important Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Question
|05.17.16
Crowell & Moring's Trade Secrets Trends
Tyler's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.24.25
On October 23rd, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) containing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANOPR”) with principles for all large load interconnections across the US, including those co-located with generating facilities.[1] Significantly, the Secretary of Energy states that the interconnection of large loads to the transmission system “falls squarely” within FERC’s jurisdiction, thus weighing in on a dispute that has been pending before FERC for over a year. This move appears to be a reaction to the continued pendency before FERC of the colocation dockets[2] and a technical conference on colocation held almost a year ago.[3]
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.03.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.03.25
Event | 09.24.25



