DOE Grant Termination Shutdown Show Down
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.03.25
Yesterday, the Department of Energy (“DOE”) announced its termination of 321 grants and other awards supporting 223 energy projects. The terminated awards were issued by the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, the Grid Deployment Office, the Office of Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.
DOE stated that the terminations were in furtherance of its May 15, 2025 policy requiring DOE to conduct additional diligence of existing grants on a case-by-case to “identify wasteful spending,” although public reporting indicates all of the canceled awards are in states with Democratic leadership. At least some of the terminated awards appear to have already elapsed prior to DOE’s action.
As with the May 2025 grant terminations, DOE’s announcement informed grant recipients that they have 30 days to administratively appeal the grant terminations. That process is governed by 2 C.F.R. § 910.128, which articulates a recipient’s rights to submit a written appeal of a termination notice, request a meeting with DOE officials, and propose revisions to their grant awards that address the agency’s concerns. Numerous companies appealed DOE’s terminations in May 2025; the agency’s review of those appeals largely remains ongoing.
In addition to pursuing administrative appeals, companies may elect to litigate their grant terminations, although the appropriate venue, cause of action, preferred remedy, and case strategy will vary on a case-by-case basis. The Crowell & Moring team has been advising clients on these issues and emerging case law, and continues to monitor developments in the rapidly shifting grant litigation landscape.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.30.25
Are All Baby Products Related? TTAB Says “No”
The United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or Board) recently issued a refreshed opinion in the trademark dispute Naterra International, Inc. v. Samah Bensalem, where Naterra International, Inc. petitioned the TTAB to cancel Samah Bensalem’s registration for the mark BABIES' MAGIC TEA based on its own BABY MAGIC mark. On remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the TTAB reconsidered an expert’s opinion about relatedness of goods based on the concept of “umbrella branding” and found that the goods are unrelated and therefore again denied the petition for cancellation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.30.25
Investor Advisory Committee Recommends SEC Disclosure Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.29.25
FYI – GAO Finds Key Person “Available” Despite Accepting Employment with a Different Company
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.29.25
More Than Math: How Desjardins Recognizes AI Innovations as Patent-Eligible Technology




