Minneapolis
Overview
Crowell & Moring's Minneapolis office opened in 2026 to support longstanding client relationships in this dynamic corporate market. The office is particularly focused on the firm’s regulatory, enforcement and litigation strengths in areas, including health care, antitrust and competition, and labor and employment. In addition, attorneys have significant experience in affirmative recovery and investigations matters. In addition, attorneys have significant experience in government investigations, including under the False Claims Act, State AG matters, and affirmative recoveries for managed care organizations. The Minneapolis office serves as a bridge between the evolving needs of local clients in this fast-moving business environment and the complex regulatory and enforcement landscape driven by decisions in Washington.
Crowell & Moring
60 South Sixth Street
Suite 1100
Minneapolis, MN 55402Contact- O | +1.612.656.7200
- F | +1.612.503.3869
Contact
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.13.26
On October 1, 2026, Judge Brian M. Cogan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied NYP’s motion to dismiss a consolidated antitrust complaint brought by three self-funded union health plans. The ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates that plaintiffs can successfully allege market power against hospital systems even in the absence of traditionally high market shares. Second, the court’s reasoning closely tracks the arguments advanced by the DOJ in its Statement of Interest filed in the case: that market power need not be established through market share alone and can be shown through direct evidence such as supracompetitive pricing, and that exclusionary conduct and rival foreclosure are not required elements of a Section 1 claim. The recent decision validates the government’s legal theories and could enhance the viability of the DOJ’s parallel action against NYP, which is currently proceeding in the Southern District of New York.
Press Coverage | 10.08.26
US State AGs Say Competition Enforcement Will Factor Into Election Campaigns
Firm News | 3 min read | 10.01.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.18.26
What AI Companies Need to Know About NY AG's Whistleblower Push
Insights
- |
07.22.26
The Law Society Gazette
Crowell & Moring hires former Robins Kaplan attorneys to launch Minneapolis outpost
|05.21.26
Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal
“The Shape of Water: Back to the Basics of the Clean Water Act,” ABA Environmental Law Conference, Minneapolis, MN (awarded best article)
|04.23.26
State AG News: Online Safety, Consumer Fraud, and Antitrust (May 21-June 3, 2026)
|06.09.26
Crowell & Moring's State AG Blog
State AG News: Pricing, Infrastructure, Health Care (May 15-20, 2026)
|05.22.26
Crowell & Moring's State AG Blog
State AG News: Deceptive Practices, Privacy Violations, Antitrust Lawsuit (May 8-14, 2026)
|05.15.26
Crowell & Moring's State AG Blog
State AG News: Pharmaceuticals, Infrastructure, Fraud Schemes (April 30-May 7, 2026)
|05.08.26
Crowell & Moring's State AG Blog
State AG News: Sports Betting, Credit Agencies, Grocery Stores (April 23-29, 2026)
|05.01.26
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
Professionals
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.13.26
On October 1, 2026, Judge Brian M. Cogan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied NYP’s motion to dismiss a consolidated antitrust complaint brought by three self-funded union health plans. The ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates that plaintiffs can successfully allege market power against hospital systems even in the absence of traditionally high market shares. Second, the court’s reasoning closely tracks the arguments advanced by the DOJ in its Statement of Interest filed in the case: that market power need not be established through market share alone and can be shown through direct evidence such as supracompetitive pricing, and that exclusionary conduct and rival foreclosure are not required elements of a Section 1 claim. The recent decision validates the government’s legal theories and could enhance the viability of the DOJ’s parallel action against NYP, which is currently proceeding in the Southern District of New York.
Press Coverage | 10.08.26
US State AGs Say Competition Enforcement Will Factor Into Election Campaigns
Firm News | 3 min read | 10.01.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.18.26
What AI Companies Need to Know About NY AG's Whistleblower Push












