Minneapolis

Overview

Crowell & Moring's Minneapolis office opened in 2026 to support longstanding client relationships in this dynamic corporate market. The office is particularly focused on the firm’s regulatory, enforcement and litigation strengths in areas, including health care, antitrust and competition, and labor and employment. In addition, attorneys have significant experience in affirmative recovery and investigations matters. In addition, attorneys have significant experience in government investigations, including under the False Claims Act, State AG matters, and affirmative recoveries for managed care organizations. The Minneapolis office serves as a bridge between the evolving needs of local clients in this fast-moving business environment and the complex regulatory and enforcement landscape driven by decisions in Washington.

Contact

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.13.26

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ruling Signals Widening Antitrust Exposure for Hospital Contracting Practices

On October 1, 2026, Judge Brian M. Cogan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied NYP’s motion to dismiss a consolidated antitrust complaint brought by three self-funded union health plans. The ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates that plaintiffs can successfully allege market power against hospital systems even in the absence of traditionally high market shares. Second, the court’s reasoning closely tracks the arguments advanced by the DOJ in its Statement of Interest filed in the case: that market power need not be established through market share alone and can be shown through direct evidence such as supracompetitive pricing, and that exclusionary conduct and rival foreclosure are not required elements of a Section 1 claim. The recent decision validates the government’s legal theories and could enhance the viability of the DOJ’s parallel action against NYP, which is currently proceeding in the Southern District of New York....

Professionals

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 10.13.26

New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ruling Signals Widening Antitrust Exposure for Hospital Contracting Practices

On October 1, 2026, Judge Brian M. Cogan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied NYP’s motion to dismiss a consolidated antitrust complaint brought by three self-funded union health plans. The ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates that plaintiffs can successfully allege market power against hospital systems even in the absence of traditionally high market shares. Second, the court’s reasoning closely tracks the arguments advanced by the DOJ in its Statement of Interest filed in the case: that market power need not be established through market share alone and can be shown through direct evidence such as supracompetitive pricing, and that exclusionary conduct and rival foreclosure are not required elements of a Section 1 claim. The recent decision validates the government’s legal theories and could enhance the viability of the DOJ’s parallel action against NYP, which is currently proceeding in the Southern District of New York....