1. Home
  2. |Professionals
  3. |Donna Reuter

Donna Reuter

Counsel
Counsel
ZHJldXRlckBjcm93ZWxsLmNvbQ==
VCard
VCard

Areas of Focus

Overview

Leveraging her experiences as a practitioner in the healthcare industry, Donna capably serves clients with her industry experience and her commitment to achieving client goals.

Donna is a healthcare counsel in the Washington D.C. office, and her practice focuses on serving healthcare payer, provider, association, and industry clients in a broad array of legal matters spanning both litigation and regulatory compliance. She has previously worked on a variety of disputes involving areas of ERISA; medical malpractice; COVID-19; fraud, waste and abuse; intellectual property; and more.

Donna draws from her prior career as a pharmacist to inform her practice of the law: as a pharmacy manager for a major retail chain, and later as a clinical review pharmacist for a nationwide pharmacy benefit manager in Minnesota. She understands claims adjudication and billing processes, the pharmacy distribution chain, formulary management and utilization review processes, controlled substances laws, and pharmaceutical and healthcare adjacent areas.

In addition to her dedication to pro bono work, Donna enjoys mentoring, and is co-chair of the Minnesota Chapter of the Federal Bar Association’s quarterly newsletter, Bar Talk.

 

Career & Education

    • Mitchell Hamline School of Law, J.D., 2019
    • University of Minnesota, Pharm.D., 2011
    • California State University, Fresno, B.A., Mass Communication and Journalism, 2006
    • Mitchell Hamline School of Law, J.D., 2019
    • University of Minnesota, Pharm.D., 2011
    • California State University, Fresno, B.A., Mass Communication and Journalism, 2006

    • Minnesota
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    • Minnesota
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Donna's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.24.26

DOJ v. OhioHealth Confirms Antitrust Enforcers’ Continued Focus on Health Care Markets

On February 20, 2026, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (DOJ) and Ohio Attorney General (Ohio AG) sued OhioHealth Corporation (OhioHealth), alleging that OhioHealth had unlawfully restrained trade in the market for general acute care inpatient hospital services in the Columbus metropolitan statistical area and the narrower Central Columbus area, respectively. The DOJ and Ohio AG allege violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as the Valentine Act (Ohio’s antitrust statute), claiming that OhioHealth leveraged its market power to impose contractual restrictions that blocked payors from working with competing health systems to design “budget-conscious” lower-cost health plans....

View All Insights

Practices

Donna's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.24.26

DOJ v. OhioHealth Confirms Antitrust Enforcers’ Continued Focus on Health Care Markets

On February 20, 2026, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (DOJ) and Ohio Attorney General (Ohio AG) sued OhioHealth Corporation (OhioHealth), alleging that OhioHealth had unlawfully restrained trade in the market for general acute care inpatient hospital services in the Columbus metropolitan statistical area and the narrower Central Columbus area, respectively. The DOJ and Ohio AG allege violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as the Valentine Act (Ohio’s antitrust statute), claiming that OhioHealth leveraged its market power to impose contractual restrictions that blocked payors from working with competing health systems to design “budget-conscious” lower-cost health plans....

View All Insights