1. Home
  2. |Locations
  3. |Los Angeles

Los Angeles

Overview

Crowell’s Los Angeles office, located in the heart of downtown, opened in 2008. Our team of attorneys is composed of accomplished lawyers with extensive experience in litigation, regulatory matters, and corporate law. We are recognized for our strengths in antitrust, complex commercial litigation, government contracts, health care, intellectual property, international trade, investigations, privacy and cybersecurity, and white collar and regulatory enforcement, among others. A diverse spectrum of clients turn to Los Angeles team and the firm for counsel, including industry-leading high tech, health care, medical device, transportation, and retail and consumer products; Fortune 500 enterprises; and companies doing business with the federal government.

The Los Angeles office, with its culture of collaboration, is as committed to the community as it is to its clients. Our lawyers serve in leadership positions in the Association of Business Trial Lawyers, the Federal Bar Association, Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, the Japanese American Bar Association, and the LGBT Bar Association, to name a few.

  • Click here to explore opportunities in our Los Angeles office.

    Click here to explore opportunities in our Los Angeles office.

  • Crowell’s dedication to pro bono and public service is a core part of who we are as a firm, and our Los Angeles office takes pride in the variety of work we do to give a voice to those without access to justice. Our office exemplifies this commitment through relationships with a number of local organizations, including: Bet Tzedek, Inner City Law Center, Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, Volunteers of America, Los Angeles, Asian Americans Advancing Justice–Los Angeles, Public Counsel, and more.

    Crowell’s dedication to pro bono and public service is a core part of who we are as a firm, and our Los Angeles office takes pride in the variety of work we do to give a voice to those without access to justice. Our office exemplifies this commitment through relationships with a number of local organizations, including: Bet Tzedek, Inner City Law Center, Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, Volunteers of America, Los Angeles, Asian Americans Advancing Justice–Los Angeles, Public Counsel, and more.

  • Our Los Angeles office is committed to taking bold action to keep us moving forward in diversity, equity, and inclusion. Our office managing partner is a woman of color, and a number of our diverse lawyers are leaders in the community. This includes a board member of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, a vice chair (diversity) for the Los Angeles County Bar Association, a board member of the South Asian Bar Association of Southern California, a board member of the Federal Bar Association of Los Angeles, a board member of Inner City Law Center, an officer of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, a pro bono advisory council member of Asian Americans Advancing Justice–Los Angeles, and many more. The office also includes several alumni of Legal Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellows and Pathfinders Programs.

    Our Los Angeles office is committed to taking bold action to keep us moving forward in diversity, equity, and inclusion. Our office managing partner is a woman of color, and a number of our diverse lawyers are leaders in the community. This includes a board member of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, a vice chair (diversity) for the Los Angeles County Bar Association, a board member of the South Asian Bar Association of Southern California, a board member of the Federal Bar Association of Los Angeles, a board member of Inner City Law Center, an officer of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, a pro bono advisory council member of Asian Americans Advancing Justice–Los Angeles, and many more. The office also includes several alumni of Legal Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellows and Pathfinders Programs.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.12.25

The End of the Continuous SAM Registration Requirement …. Almost

On August 7, 2025, the FAR Council issued a final rule amending FAR 52.204-7 to clarify that, effective immediately, an offeror’s failure to maintain continuous System for Award Management (SAM) registration between proposal submission and contract award does not render the offeror ineligible for award, so long as the offeror was registered in SAM at the time of proposal submission and is registered at the time of contract award. The final rule should address situations like TLS Joint Venture, LLC, B-422275, Apr. 1, 2024, 2024 CPD ¶ 74, where an offeror’s SAM registration lapsed for a single day between the proposal submission and award dates, and GAO found the offeror ineligible for award....

View All Insights

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.12.25

The End of the Continuous SAM Registration Requirement …. Almost

Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.25.25

EU Adopts the Largest Ever Trade Countermeasures Against the U.S. to Apply if EU-U.S. Trade Negotiations Fail

Client Alert | 16 min read | 07.25.25

White House AI Action Plan Seeks to Establish “Dominance,” Boost Innovation, and Scrutinize Regulations

Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.24.25

What’s Old is New Again: the Expansion of Sharing Tax Information and the Effect on Employment and Immigration Cases

View All Insights

Professionals

View All Professionals

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.12.25

The End of the Continuous SAM Registration Requirement …. Almost

On August 7, 2025, the FAR Council issued a final rule amending FAR 52.204-7 to clarify that, effective immediately, an offeror’s failure to maintain continuous System for Award Management (SAM) registration between proposal submission and contract award does not render the offeror ineligible for award, so long as the offeror was registered in SAM at the time of proposal submission and is registered at the time of contract award. The final rule should address situations like TLS Joint Venture, LLC, B-422275, Apr. 1, 2024, 2024 CPD ¶ 74, where an offeror’s SAM registration lapsed for a single day between the proposal submission and award dates, and GAO found the offeror ineligible for award....

View All Insights