Derick D. Dailey
Overview
Derick Dailey is a Counsel in Crowell’s State Attorney General, Litigation and Trial, and White Collar Investigations Practice Groups.
Career & Education
- Department of Justice: U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Delaware
Assistant U.S. Attorney, 2019–2021
Chief, Financial Litigation Unit - New Jersey
Senior Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, 2022–2024
- Department of Justice: U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Delaware
- Fordham University School of Law, J.D., 2017
- Yale University, M.A., Religion, 2014
- Westminster College, B.A., 2011
- New York
- District of Columbia
- New Jersey
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Missouri (Inactive)
- Member, American Bar Association
- Member, National Bar Association
- Board Member, Fordham Law Alumni Association
- Trustee, Legal Services of New Jersey
- Trustee, New Jersey Governor’s Reentry Training and Employment Center
- Board Member, Pipeline to Law Foundation
Derick's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.08.25
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta: What the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling Could Mean for Online Speech Regulation
On September 9, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction as to certain provisions of California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act. This interlocutory ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates why and how state laws can withstand and avoid First Amendment challenges. Second, it showcases the potential difficulties in establishing associational standing on behalf of member technology and digital commerce companies.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.17.25
Speaking Engagement | 09.09.25
Representative Matters
- Representing a medical billing company before a state regulator for alleged insurance fraud. Successfully resolved the matter pre-litigation.
- Representing a national non-profit organization in third-party discovery disputes and third-party indemnification litigation brought by State Attorney Generals from Missouri, Montana, Idaho, and Indiana. Successfully resolved third-party discovery matter on oral argument.
- Representing individual in a healthcare fraud investigation by the Arkansas Attorney General, Arkansas Medicaid Office of the Inspector General, and State Licensing Board.
- Providing counseling and consulting services to a national professional organization of State Attorneys General relating to public safety and criminal legal policy.
- Representing a university in federal court with respect to Title IX claims arising out of student disciplinary proceedings.
- Representing a university in an internal investigation of a sensitive employment matter
- Representing a national telecommunications company in state court in a multimillion litigation relating to a contract dispute.
Derick's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.08.25
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta: What the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling Could Mean for Online Speech Regulation
On September 9, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction as to certain provisions of California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act. This interlocutory ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates why and how state laws can withstand and avoid First Amendment challenges. Second, it showcases the potential difficulties in establishing associational standing on behalf of member technology and digital commerce companies.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.17.25
Speaking Engagement | 09.09.25
Recognition
- Northeast Black Law Students Association: 57 Most Influential Black Lawyers in the Northeast, 2025
- Obama Foundation, USA Leaders, 2024–2025
- The National Black Lawyers Top 40 Under 40, 2021–2024
Derick's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.08.25
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta: What the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling Could Mean for Online Speech Regulation
On September 9, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction as to certain provisions of California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act. This interlocutory ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates why and how state laws can withstand and avoid First Amendment challenges. Second, it showcases the potential difficulties in establishing associational standing on behalf of member technology and digital commerce companies.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.17.25
Speaking Engagement | 09.09.25
Insights
NJEA Summer Leadership Conference - National Black Law Students Association
|07.27.24
2024 American Legion New Jersey Boys State Program
|06.16.24
State AGs Advance Consumer Protection Through Settlements, Lawsuits, and New Initiatives
|10.06.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
State AG News: Consumer Protection, Fraud, AI August 14-20, 2025
|08.22.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
- |
08.06.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
State AG News: Health Care, Privacy Violation, Contracts July 17-30, 2025
|08.06.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
- |
08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
- |
07.31.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
State AG News: Deceptive Practices, Federal Funding, Antitrust Lawsuits July 3-9, 2025
|07.14.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
- |
07.08.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
State AG News: Common Scams, Inflated Costs Post-Natural Disasters, Underpaid Wages June 12-18, 2025
|06.27.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
State AG News: Robocalls, False Advertising, Inflated Rent May 29-June 11, 2025
|06.16.25
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
Derick's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.08.25
NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta: What the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling Could Mean for Online Speech Regulation
On September 9, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction as to certain provisions of California’s Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act. This interlocutory ruling is significant for two reasons. First, it demonstrates why and how state laws can withstand and avoid First Amendment challenges. Second, it showcases the potential difficulties in establishing associational standing on behalf of member technology and digital commerce companies.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.17.25
Speaking Engagement | 09.09.25