Stephen J. McBrady

Partner

Overview

Steve McBrady is Managing Partner of Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, and a member the firm’s Management Board and Executive Committee.

Steve serves as a strategic adviser to in-house counsel and corporate executives on high-stakes matters involving the U.S. government, drawing on two decades of experience in Washington, and is widely viewed as one of the “go-to” lawyers for disputes involving the U.S. government. 

Over the past several years, he has received the National Law Journal’s “Winning Litigator” award as a lawyer who has “tackled some of the most widely watched cases of the year,” as well the “D.C. Trailblazer” award, recognizing lawyers who have “made significant marks on the practice.” Steve has been named one of the top lawyers in the government contracts field by Chambers USA, and in both 2018 and 2022, was named “Government Contracts MVP” by Law360.

Over the course of his career, Steve has successfully litigated dozens of cases before state and federal courts around the country. In 2020, he served as counsel in the landmark $13 billion Affordable Care Act “risk corridors” litigation at the U.S. Supreme Court, resulting in an 8-1 decision in favor of his clients, and one of the largest civil judgments entered against the U.S. Government.

In the lower courts and boards of contract appeals, Steve’s litigation teams have scored precedent-setting victories in matters arising under the Contracts Disputes Act, the Tucker Act, the Debt Collection Act, and the Federal Arbitration Act, recovering billions of dollars for Crowell’s clients under a variety of contractual and statutory claims. Outside the courtroom, he is often called upon to resolve sensitive commercial matters via alternative dispute resolution, including confidential arbitration and mediation, and has developed a reputation for resolving cases early in the dispute stage, identifying win-win legal and business resolutions.

Steve’s commentary on government-facing issues have been featured in The New York Times, Politico, and various other print, radio, and television media. He frequently speaks at government and industry events around the country, and he provides on-site training to legal and executive teams on a range of topics.

Career & Education

    • U.S. Senate
      Legislative Aide, U.S. Senator Susan M. Collins, 2001–2003
    • Colorado
      Special Assistant Attorney General, 2018–2021
    • U.S. Senate
      Legislative Aide, U.S. Senator Susan M. Collins, 2001–2003
    • Colorado
      Special Assistant Attorney General, 2018–2021
    • The George Washington University Law School, J.D.
    • Cornell University, B.A.
    • The George Washington University Law School, J.D.
    • Cornell University, B.A.
    • District of Columbia
    • Virginia
    • Supreme Court of the United States
    • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
    • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    • District of Columbia
    • Virginia
    • Supreme Court of the United States
    • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
    • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
  • Professional Activities and Memberships

    Board of Advisors, Mayflower Foundation
    Aerospace & Defense Law360 Editorial Advisory Board Member, 20142017

    Professional Activities and Memberships

    Board of Advisors, Mayflower Foundation
    Aerospace & Defense Law360 Editorial Advisory Board Member, 20142017

    • French
    • Spanish
    • French
    • Spanish
Naturally a good communicator, Steve is effective as a result of his strategic positioning and his appreciation for opposing viewpoints, countering them all the better based on his deep understanding of the subject matter at hand. Steve is well respected among his peers for good reason: He is superbly prepared and his arguments are rock solid.

— Kevin Lewis, CEO, Health Options

Stephen's Insights

Webinar | 12.10.25

Terminations, Stop Work Orders, and De-Scopes – The Latest Updates and Recovery Opportunities for USAID Contractors and Grant Recipients

In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.

Stephen's Insights

Webinar | 12.10.25

Terminations, Stop Work Orders, and De-Scopes – The Latest Updates and Recovery Opportunities for USAID Contractors and Grant Recipients

In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.