Patent Prosecution
Overview
Technology and the laws meant to protect it—especially the patent laws—are always changing. But the law is not always in sync with technological developments. Companies seeking protection for their state-of-the-art innovations need counsel who not only know what the law is, but where it is likely headed. Crowell & Moring’s team of experienced patent professionals have the experience, knowledge, and judgment to provide such guidance to our clients.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.13.26
A New Frontier for Added Subject-Matter at the EPO?
At the European Patent Office (EPO), a recent referral of case T 873/24 from the Technical Board to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may clarify whether last summer’s decision in case G 1/24 on claim interpretation may be extended to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter. Already G 1/24 is impacting the assessment of patentability at the EPO, but should this referral be allowed, G 1/24’s effect on the assessment of added matter could result in a real shake up of the EPO’s notoriously strict assessment of support. Nonetheless, a review of how we got here highlights the value of late arguments during the EPO appeal process.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 03.19.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
Firm News | 3 min read | 01.27.26
IP Attorney John Paik Joins Crowell & Moring’s Patents Group
Insights
EV charging stations & connectors: the importance of design patents
|11.15.24
EV Design & Manufacturing
Professionals
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.13.26
A New Frontier for Added Subject-Matter at the EPO?
At the European Patent Office (EPO), a recent referral of case T 873/24 from the Technical Board to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may clarify whether last summer’s decision in case G 1/24 on claim interpretation may be extended to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter. Already G 1/24 is impacting the assessment of patentability at the EPO, but should this referral be allowed, G 1/24’s effect on the assessment of added matter could result in a real shake up of the EPO’s notoriously strict assessment of support. Nonetheless, a review of how we got here highlights the value of late arguments during the EPO appeal process.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 03.19.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
Firm News | 3 min read | 01.27.26
IP Attorney John Paik Joins Crowell & Moring’s Patents Group
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.13.26
A New Frontier for Added Subject-Matter at the EPO?
At the European Patent Office (EPO), a recent referral of case T 873/24 from the Technical Board to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may clarify whether last summer’s decision in case G 1/24 on claim interpretation may be extended to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter. Already G 1/24 is impacting the assessment of patentability at the EPO, but should this referral be allowed, G 1/24’s effect on the assessment of added matter could result in a real shake up of the EPO’s notoriously strict assessment of support. Nonetheless, a review of how we got here highlights the value of late arguments during the EPO appeal process.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 03.19.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.17.26
Firm News | 3 min read | 01.27.26
IP Attorney John Paik Joins Crowell & Moring’s Patents Group














