Marie Jansson Heeks

Partner

Overview

As a partner in Crowell's London office, Marie brings a wealth of expertise as a qualified solicitor, solicitor advocate, and UK and European patent attorney. Her practice encompasses all aspects of intellectual property, from the initial development of protection strategies to the commercialisation and exploitation of valuable assets. Her approach is holistic, ensuring that IP strategies are not only proportionate, but also aligned with her clients' business objectives.

Marie has played a pivotal role in developing and executing IP portfolio management strategies, ensuring that her clients' intellectual assets are robustly protected and strategically managed. Her extensive experience in patent prosecution has involved significant interactions with various patent offices, where she has adeptly navigated complex legal landscapes to secure favorable outcomes for her clients. Marie has been actively involved in numerous opposition and appeal proceedings, showcasing her ability to advocate effectively and resolve disputes in high-stakes environments.

Career & Education

    • College of Law, London, Professional Skills Course, 2012
    • College of Law, London, Legal Practice Course, 2011
    • Queen Mary University of London, M.Sc., Intellectual Property Law, 2008
    • BPP Law School, London, Diploma in Law, 2006
    • London School of Economics, University of London, Diploma in Financial Accounting, 2005
    • University College London, BEng, Biochemical Engineering, 2005
    • Lund University, Diploma in Swedish Language, 2003
    • College of Law, London, Professional Skills Course, 2012
    • College of Law, London, Legal Practice Course, 2011
    • Queen Mary University of London, M.Sc., Intellectual Property Law, 2008
    • BPP Law School, London, Diploma in Law, 2006
    • London School of Economics, University of London, Diploma in Financial Accounting, 2005
    • University College London, BEng, Biochemical Engineering, 2005
    • Lund University, Diploma in Swedish Language, 2003
    • Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Chartered UK Patent Attorney, 2013
    • European Patent Office, European Qualifying Examinations, 2012
    • Senior Courts of England and Wales, Solicitor, 2012
    • Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Chartered UK Patent Attorney, 2013
    • European Patent Office, European Qualifying Examinations, 2012
    • Senior Courts of England and Wales, Solicitor, 2012
    • Swedish
    • Swedish

Marie's Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.13.26

A New Frontier for Added Subject-Matter at the EPO?

At the European Patent Office (EPO), a recent referral of case T 873/24 from the Technical Board to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may clarify whether last summer’s decision in case G 1/24 on claim interpretation may be extended to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter. Already G 1/24 is impacting the assessment of patentability at the EPO, but should this referral be allowed, G 1/24’s effect on the assessment of added matter could result in a real shake up of the EPO’s notoriously strict assessment of support. Nonetheless, a review of how we got here highlights the value of late arguments during the EPO appeal process....

Marie's Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.13.26

A New Frontier for Added Subject-Matter at the EPO?

At the European Patent Office (EPO), a recent referral of case T 873/24 from the Technical Board to the Enlarged Board of Appeal may clarify whether last summer’s decision in case G 1/24 on claim interpretation may be extended to the analysis of Added Subject-Matter. Already G 1/24 is impacting the assessment of patentability at the EPO, but should this referral be allowed, G 1/24’s effect on the assessment of added matter could result in a real shake up of the EPO’s notoriously strict assessment of support. Nonetheless, a review of how we got here highlights the value of late arguments during the EPO appeal process....