Paul Freeman
Overview
Paul Freeman is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s New York office and a member of the firm’s Environment and Natural Resources and Government Contracts groups. He brings two decades of diverse experience advising clients in the energy, maritime, and aerospace and defense industries on a range of issues, with a primary emphasis on matters involving enforcement defense, litigation, and risk management.
Career & Education
- Environmental Protection Agency
Office of General Counsel Honors Program, 1997
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Vermont Law School, M.S.E.L., cum laude, 2001
- Vermont Law School, J.D., 1998
- St. Lawrence University, B.A., cum laude, 1995
- New York
- Connecticut
- District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
Paul's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program.
Firm News | 2 min read | 05.22.26
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.23.25
The Other PFAS Shoe Drops: EPA Will Retain and Defend Its CERCLA PFAS Regulation
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.16.25
Recognition
- Law360: Practice Group of the Year – Government Contracts, 2019
Paul's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program.
Firm News | 2 min read | 05.22.26
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.23.25
The Other PFAS Shoe Drops: EPA Will Retain and Defend Its CERCLA PFAS Regulation
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.16.25
Insights
Zero-Emission Vehicle Transition For Federal Fleets: A Practical Discussion
|05.20.22
National Law Journal
Biden Administration to Use Purchasing Power for Climate Change, Clean Energy Goals
|12.22.20
Bloomberg Law
Government Contracts – A Secure Supply Chain Is a Competitive Advantage
|02.26.20
Crowell & Moring's Regulatory Forecast 2020
Biden’s Environmental Justice Push and Its Impact on Retailers’ ESG Considerations
|05.26.21
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
Practices
Industries
Paul's Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.28.26
Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew a February 2024 Biden administration proposed rule, “Definition of Hazardous Waste Applicable to Corrective Action for Releases From Solid Waste Management Units,” under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).[1] The withdrawn proposal would have revised RCRA corrective action regulations to expressly apply the broader statutory definition of “hazardous waste,” rather than only the narrower regulatory definition. Now, EPA is maintaining the status quo for corrective action under RCRA. However, EPA’s withdrawal of its proposed RCRA hazardous waste definition makes no mention of its corresponding proposal from 2024 to list nine per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as RCRA hazardous constituents.[2] This disjointed withdrawal, while providing some certainty for regulated entities, does not resolve how EPA plans to address PFAS under the RCRA program.
Firm News | 2 min read | 05.22.26
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.23.25
The Other PFAS Shoe Drops: EPA Will Retain and Defend Its CERCLA PFAS Regulation
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.16.25




