Lauren Blanchard
Overview
An associate in Dispute Resolution in Crowell & Moring’s London office, Lauren Blanchard is esteemed by her clients as “an invaluable asset to any case.” Her strategic and actionable legal advice, strong work ethic under pressure, and collaborative approach has led her to handle numerous high value, high profile cases involving multiple jurisdictions and complex issues.
She regularly represents multinational corporates, sovereigns, international institutions, and executives across a range of industries, including automotive, aerospace and aviation, banking and finance, insurance, construction, energy, oil and gas, mining, shipping, and transport.
Career & Education
- London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), B.Sc. Hons, 2008
- BPP Law School, London, G.D.L., distinction, 2018
- BPP Law School, London, LPC, distinction, 2019
- Qualified Solicitor, England and Wales
- French
- Hebrew
- Spanish
Lauren's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.23.23
Holding Iran Accountable for Hamas Terrorist Attacks
The world has watched in horror as tragedy has unfolded in Israel because of the brutal terrorist attacks carried out by Hamas. Nothing can compensate for the devastating loss of life, for the trauma suffered by those injured or kidnapped, or for the grief, sorrow, fear, and anger felt by family members. For the past twenty-five years, American victims or family members have held Iran accountable in U.S. courts for its sponsorship and support of murderous and terrorist acts like those carried out by Hamas in Israel. The U.S. legal system may again be a vehicle to hold Iran and its proxies to account today.
Speaking Engagement | 10.12.23
“The State Withdrawals from the ECT: are the justifications correct under international law?”, Juris Conferences–Seventeenth Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Debate and Discussion, Washington, D.C.
Publication | 10.19.19
Monopolizing War: Codifying the Laws of War to Reassert Governmental Authority, 1856–1874
Representative Matters
Representative English Litigation Matters
- Acting for an airline against an aircraft original equipment manufacturer in the Technology and Construction Court. The $2 billion dispute concerned multiple claims of breach of contract, with proceedings on an expediated timetable.
- In the Venezuela gold case, acting for a central bank in the Commercial Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court, all on an expediated timetable. The $2 billion dispute concerned access to sovereign assets.
- Arising from the RoRo cartel, defending a shipping company in follow-on damage claims in the Competition Appeal Tribunal, including class action claims.
- Arising from the Trucks cartel, pursuing cartel follow-on damages claims for logistics and FMCG companies in the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
Representative Commercial and Construction Arbitration Matters
- In a Russia sanctions case, representing an industrial manufacturer in a Geneva-seated, Swiss Rule arbitration, arising out of alleged breach of contract due to sanctions compliance.
- In a COVID-19 PPE case, representing a multinational health care company in a SIAC, Singapore-seated arbitration for breach of contract, arising from violation of U.S. trade law prohibiting forced labour.
- Representing the owner of an airport against the EPCM in a multibillion-dollar breach of contract claim in an ICC, London-seated arbitration.
- Acting for a ship builder in an ad-hoc, London-seated arbitration and subsequent appeal and enforcement proceedings under the English Arbitration Act.
Representative Investor State Arbitration Matters
- Defending the respondent state in an ICSID arbitration concerning the annulment of a gold mining concession and the subsequent environmental consequences.
- Defending the respondent state in an ICSID arbitration concerning the construction of an energy pipeline, allegedly tendered by corruption.
- Defending the respondent state in an ICSID arbitration concerning the cancellation of six related energy projects.
- Defending the respondent state in an UNCITRAL arbitration concerning the supply of national health services.
Representative U.S. Litigation Matters
- In a Russian aircraft cases, defending an insurer in a billion-dollar claim brought by an aircraft lessor for aircraft that remain in Russia following the invasion of Ukraine.
- Representing victims of the October 7thterrorist attacks in Israel in a case against Iran, Syria, and North Korea, brought under an exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act .
- Representing victims of terror attacks in a case brought under the Anti-Terrorism Act, and subsequent appeal in the Second Circuit.
- Advising on multiple civil rights actions concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and facial recognition technology.
Representative U.S. Investigation Matters
- Representing a banking executive in Department of Justice and False Claims Act (FCA) investigations concerning alleged misconduct during sovereign debt transactions.
- Representing a banking executive in Department of Justice and FCA investigations concerning alleged misconduct related to executive appointments.
Lauren's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.23.23
Holding Iran Accountable for Hamas Terrorist Attacks
The world has watched in horror as tragedy has unfolded in Israel because of the brutal terrorist attacks carried out by Hamas. Nothing can compensate for the devastating loss of life, for the trauma suffered by those injured or kidnapped, or for the grief, sorrow, fear, and anger felt by family members. For the past twenty-five years, American victims or family members have held Iran accountable in U.S. courts for its sponsorship and support of murderous and terrorist acts like those carried out by Hamas in Israel. The U.S. legal system may again be a vehicle to hold Iran and its proxies to account today.
Speaking Engagement | 10.12.23
“The State Withdrawals from the ECT: are the justifications correct under international law?”, Juris Conferences–Seventeenth Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Debate and Discussion, Washington, D.C.
Publication | 10.19.19
Monopolizing War: Codifying the Laws of War to Reassert Governmental Authority, 1856–1874
Insights
Monopolizing War: Codifying the Laws of War to Reassert Governmental Authority, 1856–1874
|10.19.19
European Journal of International Law
The International Arbitration Rulebook: A Guide to Arbitral Regimes
|10.19.19
“The State Withdrawals from the ECT: are the justifications correct under international law?”, Juris Conferences–Seventeenth Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Debate and Discussion, Washington, D.C.
|10.12.23
Practices
Lauren's Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 10.23.23
Holding Iran Accountable for Hamas Terrorist Attacks
The world has watched in horror as tragedy has unfolded in Israel because of the brutal terrorist attacks carried out by Hamas. Nothing can compensate for the devastating loss of life, for the trauma suffered by those injured or kidnapped, or for the grief, sorrow, fear, and anger felt by family members. For the past twenty-five years, American victims or family members have held Iran accountable in U.S. courts for its sponsorship and support of murderous and terrorist acts like those carried out by Hamas in Israel. The U.S. legal system may again be a vehicle to hold Iran and its proxies to account today.
Speaking Engagement | 10.12.23
“The State Withdrawals from the ECT: are the justifications correct under international law?”, Juris Conferences–Seventeenth Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Debate and Discussion, Washington, D.C.
Publication | 10.19.19
Monopolizing War: Codifying the Laws of War to Reassert Governmental Authority, 1856–1874