Insights
Professional
Practice
Industry
Region
Trending Topics
Location
Type
Sort by:
Firm News 2 results
Firm News | 2 min read | 10.14.25
Crowell Earns Top Rankings from Legal 500 United Kingdom 2026
London – October 14, 2025: Crowell & Moring U.K. LLP has been recommended in five practice areas in the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2026.
Firm News | 2 min read | 10.07.24
Crowell Earns Top Rankings from Legal 500 United Kingdom 2025
Crowell & Moring U.K. LLP has been recommended in five practice areas in the Legal 500 United Kingdom 2025.
Client Alerts 4 results
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.14.26
Supply Chain Disruption – Again
Businesses affected by the Strait of Hormuz crisis are likely to be navigating both sides of the contractual liability equation: seeking to enforce protections while simultaneously trying to limit their own exposure. This balancing act will feel familiar to those who managed supply chain disruptions during the Covid pandemic or in response to Russian sanctions. But the scale of uncertainty and the severity of the current situation make it particularly challenging to chart a clear path forward. This note provides an overview of the English-law issues that have arisen in this current crisis and is relevant for companies and legal counsel seeking to understand and mitigate contractual risk in their supply chains, including for shipping, energy, commodities, and construction.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.10.25
Investing in UK Defence – Under Regulatory Scrutiny
The UK’s increased defence spending and zero-tariff trade on aircraft parts with the US is generating broad interest in the UK defence sector.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.11.25
The U.S.-UK Trade Deal – So Far
On this 4thof July, Britain was also celebrating. The first country to secure a trade deal with the Trump Administration, the U.K. can indeed celebrate the so-called Special Relationship.
Events 1 result
Event | 10.12.23
Seventeenth Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Debate & Discussion
This coming December, the withdrawal of France, Germany, and Poland from the Energy Charter Treaty will take effect. Leaders in each of these states claimed withdrawal was necessary because ECT obligations were hindering efforts to combat anthropomorphic-driven climate change. Was this stated justification correct as a matter of international investment law?