Kenneth Dintzer

Partner

Overview

Kenneth Dintzer is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Antitrust and Competition, Government Contracts, and Litigation groups. He most recently served as deputy branch director in the National Courts Section of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division, and he is a former senior trial counsel in DOJ’s Antitrust Division. He was a leading Department of Justice litigator for more than 30 years, where he handled many of DOJ’s most high-profile and complex cases.

A seasoned first-chair trial lawyer, Kenneth has served attorneys general during six presidential administrations. He has led litigation involving innovative technologies, financial services, government contracts, and more. He has deep experience in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and has argued more than 25 cases at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

At Crowell & Moring, Kenneth represents leading corporations in litigation involving antitrust, government contracts, and other complex disputes stemming from enforcement actions and other concerns.  Kenneth plays a key role in training and mentoring young trial lawyers at Crowell & Moring, offering guidance on various aspects of litigation, such as trial skills, evidence, and discovery. Kenneth was previously recognized by the Civil Division and Executive Office for United States Attorneys for his work with DOJ’s training center at the University of South Carolina, where he taught from 2001 to 2025.

Career & Education

    • Department of Justice
      Deputy Branch Director, 2014–2024
    • Department of Justice: Antitrust Division
      Senior Trial Counsel, 2020–2024
      Trial Attorney, 1992–1997
    • Department of Justice: Civil Division
      Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, National Courts Section, 2007–2014
      Senior Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, National Courts Section, 2003–2007
      Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, National Courts Section, 1997–2003
    • Department of Justice
      Deputy Branch Director, 2014–2024
    • Department of Justice: Antitrust Division
      Senior Trial Counsel, 2020–2024
      Trial Attorney, 1992–1997
    • Department of Justice: Civil Division
      Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, National Courts Section, 2007–2014
      Senior Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, National Courts Section, 2003–2007
      Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, National Courts Section, 1997–2003
    • University of Michigan Law School, J.D., 1990
    • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo, B.S., computer science, 1987
    • University of Michigan Law School, J.D., 1990
    • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo, B.S., computer science, 1987
    • New York
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • New York
    • District of Columbia
    • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • Clerk to Hon., Glenn L. Archer, Jr.
    • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • Clerk to Hon., Glenn L. Archer, Jr.

Kenneth's Insights

Client Alert | 9 min read | 05.06.26

After the Verdict: Navigating the Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Fallout

On April 15, 2026, a federal jury found Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster liable on every antitrust count submitted, including monopolization of primary ticketing markets and illegal bundling of its promotions and venue business lines. The jury found the defendants liable for $1.72 for each primary concert ticket sold pursuant to the anticompetitive conduct.[1] The trial opened March 2, 2026, before Judge Arun Subramanian in the Southern District of New York, as a case brought by the federal government and a coalition of states. The case, however, was rocked by an early-trial settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the defendants. Although the DOJ and six of the plaintiff states (Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota) exited the trial, 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected the settlement, brought in a law firm, and moved forward with the trial. Next up for the case: (1) a statutorily required Tunney Act review of the DOJ’s settlement; (2) defendants’ Rule 50 and Rule 59 motions; (3) determination by the Court of how many tickets are subject to the $1.72 damage award (before trebling as per the Clayton Act); and (4) a remedy phase where the Court will consider plaintiffs’ likely proposal to sever Ticketmaster from Live Nation....

Kenneth's Insights

Client Alert | 9 min read | 05.06.26

After the Verdict: Navigating the Live Nation/Ticketmaster Antitrust Fallout

On April 15, 2026, a federal jury found Live Nation and its subsidiary Ticketmaster liable on every antitrust count submitted, including monopolization of primary ticketing markets and illegal bundling of its promotions and venue business lines. The jury found the defendants liable for $1.72 for each primary concert ticket sold pursuant to the anticompetitive conduct.[1] The trial opened March 2, 2026, before Judge Arun Subramanian in the Southern District of New York, as a case brought by the federal government and a coalition of states. The case, however, was rocked by an early-trial settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the defendants. Although the DOJ and six of the plaintiff states (Arkansas, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota) exited the trial, 33 states and the District of Columbia rejected the settlement, brought in a law firm, and moved forward with the trial. Next up for the case: (1) a statutorily required Tunney Act review of the DOJ’s settlement; (2) defendants’ Rule 50 and Rule 59 motions; (3) determination by the Court of how many tickets are subject to the $1.72 damage award (before trebling as per the Clayton Act); and (4) a remedy phase where the Court will consider plaintiffs’ likely proposal to sever Ticketmaster from Live Nation....