Joanna Rosen Forster
Overview
From startups to publicly traded companies, clients trust Joanna Forster with their most complex commercial disputes and regulatory matters across global jurisdictions. Joanna is a go-to “bet-the-company” litigator with a proven record representing companies in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations. She counsels clients in a broad array of matters, including technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI. She views her role as both a conflict manager, dispensing advice to avoid adversarial action; and a tech and business litigator, resolving disputes with her clients’ business goals in mind.
Career & Education
- California
Deputy Attorney General, Corporate Fraud Section, California Department of Justice, 2015–2021
- California
- General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, ContextLogic, Inc.
- University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D., 2006
- University of California, Berkeley, B.A., political science, 2000
- California
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
- Law Clerk, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, 2009
- Extern, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Honorable Audrey B. Collins, 2004
Professional Activities and Memberships
- Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: Board Member
- Family House Inc.: Member, Family Services Committee
- English
- Spanish
Joanna's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: Part Deux
In our previous client alert, we addressed how algorithms and platform features that rely on user generated speech might not receive Section 230 protections because those features may not be considered platform user content. In these instances, the platform might not carry user generated water through the pipe, but adds its own to the mixture. At the same time, if it is true that there is less Section 230 protection, these same elements should then imbue the content with First Amendment protections as the expressive content of the platform.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
Publication | 08.19.26
The Next Saga In The End-to-End Encryption Debate: When the Cure Becomes the Crisis
Representative Matters
- Lead counsel representing a San Francisco-based blockchain in various litigation and arbitration matters relating to corporate governance and disputes with former advisor and founder.
- Representing prominent AI enterprise company alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract by a former customer.
- Representing major retail platform facing class action allegations regarding deceptive and unfair pricing practices and misleading disclosures online.
- Represent nationwide e-tailer facing allegations and claims of deceptive pricing and illegal processing of personal data.
- Served as external general counsel and chief compliance officer for ContextLogic Inc., a publicly traded company operating in over 60 countries. In this capacity, Joanna advised on all aspects of the business and public company functions and provided counsel to the board of directors.
- Served as a member of the litigation team that secured over $1 billion in recovery for CalPERS and CalSTRs in connection with the rating, due diligence, and underwriting of residential mortgage-backed securities following the financial crisis of 2008–2010, which received the Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in 2019.
Joanna's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: Part Deux
In our previous client alert, we addressed how algorithms and platform features that rely on user generated speech might not receive Section 230 protections because those features may not be considered platform user content. In these instances, the platform might not carry user generated water through the pipe, but adds its own to the mixture. At the same time, if it is true that there is less Section 230 protection, these same elements should then imbue the content with First Amendment protections as the expressive content of the platform.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
Publication | 08.19.26
The Next Saga In The End-to-End Encryption Debate: When the Cure Becomes the Crisis
Recognition
- Daily Journal: Leading Commercial Litigators; Top Women Lawyers List, 2026
- The Burton Awards: Distinguished Legal Writing, 2025
Joanna's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: Part Deux
In our previous client alert, we addressed how algorithms and platform features that rely on user generated speech might not receive Section 230 protections because those features may not be considered platform user content. In these instances, the platform might not carry user generated water through the pipe, but adds its own to the mixture. At the same time, if it is true that there is less Section 230 protection, these same elements should then imbue the content with First Amendment protections as the expressive content of the platform.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
Publication | 08.19.26
The Next Saga In The End-to-End Encryption Debate: When the Cure Becomes the Crisis
Insights
The Next Saga In The End-to-End Encryption Debate: When the Cure Becomes the Crisis
|08.19.26
Cybersecurity and AI Law Report
Is Section 230 Going To Change? The FTC, DOJ And FCC Signal Significant Change For Online Businesses
|06.26.25
The Computer & Intranet Lawyer
Big Tech finds a foe in Texas’ robust consumer protection laws and AG Ken Paxton
|06.03.26
The Texas Tribune
- |
04.15.26
UCLA’s Continuing Education of the Bar
FTC Warns 10 Companies About Their Consumer Reviews, Signaling Kickoff of Heightened Enforcement
|12.29.25
Corporate Counsel
- |
08.21.24
Los Angeles Times
State AG News: Robocalls, Fintech, Administrative Law (July 9-16, 2026)
|07.21.26
Crowell & Moring's State AG Blog FTC Blog Updates (June 1-12, 2026)
|06.17.26
Crowell & Moring's Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
- |
04.16.26
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
FTC Issues Five-Year Strategic Plan: What Businesses Need to Know
|04.13.26
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
State AG News: EPA, Fuel Pricing, Data Security (March 26-April 2, 2026)
|04.03.26
Crowell & Moring’s State AG Blog
Landmark Verdicts Against Meta and YouTube Signal New Era of Social Media Platform Liability
|04.01.26
Crowell & Moring’s Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
Joanna's Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: Part Deux
In our previous client alert, we addressed how algorithms and platform features that rely on user generated speech might not receive Section 230 protections because those features may not be considered platform user content. In these instances, the platform might not carry user generated water through the pipe, but adds its own to the mixture. At the same time, if it is true that there is less Section 230 protection, these same elements should then imbue the content with First Amendment protections as the expressive content of the platform.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
Publication | 08.19.26
The Next Saga In The End-to-End Encryption Debate: When the Cure Becomes the Crisis




