Jacob Canter

Counsel | He/Him/His

Overview

Jacob Canter’s practice focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, intellectual property, and artificial intelligence (AI). Leveraging his experience across these areas of law, Jacob helps companies succeed through strategic compliance counseling, negotiations and licensing to support business transactions, and litigation when disputes arise.

Privacy and cybersecurity. Jacob helps companies navigate general and subject-matter-specific privacy and cybersecurity laws, building programs grounded in data minimization and industry best practices. He has resolved dozens of privacy class action and data breach disputes—always minimizing costs and liability. Jacob also pursues affirmative privacy and cybersecurity claims on behalf of clients, holding bad actors accountable. And he regularly assists clients responding to threat actor attacks.

Jacob routinely counsels clients on compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), the Automated License Plate Recognition statute (ALPR), the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRAA), SEC Rule 17a-4, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Artificial intelligence. Jacob has exceptional AI experience. He is an active participant in Crowell’s AI Steering Committee, a close monitor of AI policy, and a team member on the first AI litigation case in the United States to reach trial. He counsels startups and the largest companies in the world on compliance with existing AI laws and helps them prepare for pending and proposed legislation.

His guidance covers the EU AI Act, the CA AI Transparency Act, NY LL 144, the CO AI Act, and California’s automated decision-making technology (ADMT) regulations.

Intellectual property. Jacob helps companies protect their most important copyright and trade secret IP. He drafts and negotiates IP licensing terms, including open-source licenses, for clients and has successfully defended multiple companies in high-stakes copyright and trade secret cases.

In a notable case in the District of Delaware, Jacob defended a worldwide video-sharing platform, achieving a settlement more than thirty times smaller than the opening demand. Through his experience, Jacob not only safeguards clients' IP assets but provides strategic value beyond immediate results.

Jacob also counsels clients on laws governing internet conduct and website design, and handles commercial contract disputes, founders disputes, competition allegations, fraud claims, warranty claims, and employment claims.

After starting his career at a global law firm in Washington, D.C. in 2019, Jacob clerked in the Southern District of New York for the Hon. Judge Lorna G. Schofield.

Career & Education

    • Reed College, B.A., Phi Beta Kappa, 2014
    • University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D., 2018
    • Reed College, B.A., Phi Beta Kappa, 2014
    • University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D., 2018
    • California
    • District of Columbia
    • California
    • District of Columbia

Jacob's Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.15.26

In Massachusetts, Section 230 Does Not Immunize Meta From Claims That Instagram’s Design Features Injure Children

Meta continues to face lawsuits around the country alleging that its platforms are designed to induce compulsive use by children. In March 2026, a California jury delivered a landmark verdict that Meta and YouTube were liable for allegedly addictive platform features that resulted in a child’s mental health distress.  ...

Representative Matters

  • Defending legal AI innovator ROSS Intelligence Inc. against copyright and tortious interference allegations involving whether a party may copy judicial opinions. Brought antitrust counterclaims alleging an impermissible tying arrangement, which have survived the pleadings.
  • Successfully defended legal technology innovator Proctorio Inc. against federal copyright law claims and allegations that the client violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
  • Bringing copyright, federal antitrust, and local competition claims against multinational companies on behalf of Xinuos Inc., a UNIX-based server operating system company.
  • Providing ongoing counseling and guidance related to data breach incidents, compliance with federal and state data breach laws, and litigation liability risks attendant to incidents.

Jacob's Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.15.26

In Massachusetts, Section 230 Does Not Immunize Meta From Claims That Instagram’s Design Features Injure Children

Meta continues to face lawsuits around the country alleging that its platforms are designed to induce compulsive use by children. In March 2026, a California jury delivered a landmark verdict that Meta and YouTube were liable for allegedly addictive platform features that resulted in a child’s mental health distress.  ...

Jacob's Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.15.26

In Massachusetts, Section 230 Does Not Immunize Meta From Claims That Instagram’s Design Features Injure Children

Meta continues to face lawsuits around the country alleging that its platforms are designed to induce compulsive use by children. In March 2026, a California jury delivered a landmark verdict that Meta and YouTube were liable for allegedly addictive platform features that resulted in a child’s mental health distress.  ...