1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Market Definition in Section 2 and Section 7: The Same But Not The Same? Question of Fact or Law? (ABA Teleconference)

Market Definition in Section 2 and Section 7: The Same But Not The Same? Question of Fact or Law? (ABA Teleconference)

Webinar | 11.15.17, 7:00 AM EST - 8:00 AM EST

Register

Antitrust is a mix of law, fact and opinion evidence—particularly when it comes to market definition. Can we use the same test (e.g., the hypothetical monopolist test) for market definition in a monopolization case as a merger case? Is market definition a question of law or fact? Should the use of a specific tool to define markets be subject to review on appeal as a question of law or fact?


Antitrust Partner Alexis J. Gilman will be presenting during the American Bar Association (ABA) panel.

For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 07.24.25

Avoiding Greenwashing Liability: Sustainability and ESG Under Scrutiny

These ESG claims were purported to be overstated, misleading, or false and unsubstantiated. While these early cases focused on false advertising and consumer protection law violations, recent cases have focused more on misleading ESG funds and investment products, net-zero targets, and carbon-neutral claims, sometimes coordinating claims across jurisdictions including the EU, UK, Australia, and the U.S.

View All Insights