1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Avoiding Greenwashing Liability: Sustainability and ESG Under Scrutiny

Avoiding Greenwashing Liability: Sustainability and ESG Under Scrutiny

Webinar | 07.24.25, 1:00 PM EDT | CLE Offered

Address

Virtual

These ESG claims were purported to be overstated, misleading, or false and unsubstantiated. While these early cases focused on false advertising and consumer protection law violations, recent cases have focused more on misleading ESG funds and investment products, net-zero targets, and carbon-neutral claims, sometimes coordinating claims across jurisdictions including the EU, UK, Australia, and the U.S.

International, federal, and state regulators continue to target greenwashing by providing clearer rules, regulations, and definitions, powering litigation. In the U.S., the FTC and SEC continue to work on the Green Guides and The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors respectively, while the EU continues to work on its Green Claims Directive and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Similarly, The UK's Financial Conduct Authority finalized the Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) and the FCA Anti-Greenwashing Rule related to investment firm and product claims.

Listen as our expert panel discusses the status of international, federal, and state greenwashing regulation and enforcement, addresses noteworthy greenwashing litigation, and outlines considerations for defending these claims. The panel will also provide best practices for minimizing risk by conducting audits, governing internal disclosures, advising boards, and proactively engaging shareholders.

For more information, please visit these areas: Environmental, Social, and Governance, Environment and Natural Resources

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 11.10.25

An ELI Public Webinar - Understanding the Basics of Extended Producer Responsibility in the United States

To reduce waste and encourage recycling, an increasing number of international, federal, and local jurisdictions are embracing extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws, which have wide-reaching compliance implications for product manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and other entities falling within the varying definitions of “producers.” EPR laws assign covered producers greater responsibility for the full lifecycle of their products and establish mandatory requirements for reporting, source reduction, and financial contributions to third-party entities, known as producer responsibility organizations. EPR requirements apply to a variety of consumer product categories, including batteries, electronics, mattresses, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and, most recently, packaging and paper products.