Can Government Contractors Be Held Liable for Cleanup of PFAS Contamination at Military Installations?
Webinar | 11.15.18, 8:00 AM EST - 9:00 AM EST
An August 2017 letter from seven US Senators to the House Appropriations Committee urged the Committee to support programs that addressed per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are being detected in drinking water sources across the nation. The letter went on to indicate the DoD was conducting preliminary site inspections and that “DoD officials had suggested that clean up costs could reach as high as $2 billion.” In a March 2018 DoD report, one DoD official noted that there are more than 400 military sites with known or suspected PFAS contamination. And in the most recent Defense Appropriations bill, Congress authorized up to $20 million for the Air Force to make payments to reimburse local communities for the cleanup of PFAS contamination due to Air Force- and National Guard-related activities.
With the sheer dollar amounts in play, it seems likely the U.S. government will look for ways to recover those costs from government contractors. In this webinar, we will discuss the current state of PFAS monitoring, enforcement, and/or litigation in connection with military and NASA sites. We will draw parallels to prior attempts by the government to hold liable contractors for cleanup of federal sites. Finally, we will offer some tips and suggestions for what government contractors can be doing now to anticipate and prepare for possible government actions and, potentially, to recover its PFAS cleanup and litigation costs from the government.
Speakers
- Peter Gray, Partner
- Jonathan Baker, Partner
- Paul Freeman, Senior Counsel
For more information, please visit these areas: Environmental Contamination, Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation, Government Contracts , Environment and Natural Resources
Contact
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 09.28.26
Rethinking "the Administrative State" - Takeaways From the Supreme Court's 2025–26 Term
The Supreme Court's 2025–26 term took up several momentous cases that will influence and, in key respects, reorient constitutional separation-of-powers principles moving forward. Join the D.C. Bar Administrative Law and Agency Practice Community for a discussion of the key takeaways from the Supreme Court's 2025-26 term. This panel will examine decisions addressing the scope of executive branch authority, including cases involving tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the removal of leaders of so-called independent agencies. The discussion will also address significant orders issued on the Court's emergency docket and what these decisions and orders signal about the distinct roles the three branches of federal government play in shaping the administrative state.



