Can Government Contractors Be Held Liable for Cleanup of PFAS Contamination at Military Installations?
Webinar | 11.15.18, 8:00 AM EST - 9:00 AM EST
An August 2017 letter from seven US Senators to the House Appropriations Committee urged the Committee to support programs that addressed per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are being detected in drinking water sources across the nation. The letter went on to indicate the DoD was conducting preliminary site inspections and that “DoD officials had suggested that clean up costs could reach as high as $2 billion.” In a March 2018 DoD report, one DoD official noted that there are more than 400 military sites with known or suspected PFAS contamination. And in the most recent Defense Appropriations bill, Congress authorized up to $20 million for the Air Force to make payments to reimburse local communities for the cleanup of PFAS contamination due to Air Force- and National Guard-related activities.
With the sheer dollar amounts in play, it seems likely the U.S. government will look for ways to recover those costs from government contractors. In this webinar, we will discuss the current state of PFAS monitoring, enforcement, and/or litigation in connection with military and NASA sites. We will draw parallels to prior attempts by the government to hold liable contractors for cleanup of federal sites. Finally, we will offer some tips and suggestions for what government contractors can be doing now to anticipate and prepare for possible government actions and, potentially, to recover its PFAS cleanup and litigation costs from the government.
Speakers
- Peter Gray, Partner
- Jonathan Baker, Partner
- Paul Freeman, Senior Counsel
For more information, please visit these areas: Environmental Contamination, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation, Government Contracts , Environment and Natural Resources
Contact
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 12.10.25
In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.
Webinar | 11.24.25
AI in the Workplace: EU Rules for When Humans and Bots Team Up
