1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Can Government Contractors Be Held Liable for Cleanup of PFAS Contamination at Military Installations?

Can Government Contractors Be Held Liable for Cleanup of PFAS Contamination at Military Installations?

Webinar | 11.15.18, 8:00 AM EST - 9:00 AM EST

An August 2017 letter from seven US Senators to the House Appropriations Committee urged the Committee to support programs that addressed per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that are being detected in drinking water sources across the nation. The letter went on to indicate the DoD was conducting preliminary site inspections and that “DoD officials had suggested that clean up costs could reach as high as $2 billion.” In a March 2018 DoD report, one DoD official noted that there are more than 400 military sites with known or suspected PFAS contamination. And in the most recent Defense Appropriations bill, Congress authorized up to $20 million for the Air Force to make payments to reimburse local communities for the cleanup of PFAS contamination due to Air Force- and National Guard-related activities.


With the sheer dollar amounts in play, it seems likely the U.S. government will look for ways to recover those costs from government contractors. In this webinar, we will discuss the current state of PFAS monitoring, enforcement, and/or litigation in connection with military and NASA sites. We will draw parallels to prior attempts by the government to hold liable contractors for cleanup of federal sites. Finally, we will offer some tips and suggestions for what government contractors can be doing now to anticipate and prepare for possible government actions and, potentially, to recover its PFAS cleanup and litigation costs from the government.


Speakers
  • Peter Gray, Partner
  • Jonathan Baker, Partner
  • Paul Freeman, Senior Counsel

For more information, please visit these areas: Environmental Contamination, Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation, Government Contracts , Environment and Natural Resources

Contact

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 12.10.26

The Third-Party Perspective: Protecting Payors’ Interests in Antitrust Investigations

The Trump administration has sharpened its focus on hospital systems as a key driver of rising health care costs, and the DOJ and FTC are actively patrolling for anticompetitive conduct and mergers that contribute to these rising costs. Managed care organizations are a critical source of evidence in these investigations and are likely to receive Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs), be contacted by agency staff, or may consider proactively engaging with antitrust authorities to address competitive concerns in their markets.