Governor Signs Legislation Increasing New York Department of Health Scrutiny Over Nursing Home Sales and Other Transactions
Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.10.20
On December 16, 2019, Governor Cuomo signed into law legislation amending the New York Public Health Law to add a new section (§2803-x) imposing significant reporting obligations on nursing home operators and increasing New York State Department of Health (DOH) oversight over various transactions involving nursing homes.
Effective April 14, 2020, nursing home operators in New York will be required to disclose to DOH any “common or familial ownership” between the operator or facility and any entity or individual that provides services to the operator or the facility, and to attest to the accuracy of such disclosures on an annual basis. In addition, the operator of a nursing home will be prohibited from guaranteeing the debt or other obligation of any third party who has not received establishment approval from DOH.
Perhaps most significantly from a transactional perspective, effective April 14, 2020 nursing home operators will be required to provide DOH with 90 days’ notice prior to executing a letter of intent or other contractual agreement relating to any sale, mortgage or encumbrance of the real property of the facility. In addition, new §2803-x includes a “clawback” provision – in the event of a sale of a facility resulting in a change in use that is “not a health care purpose,” the operator will be required to remit to DOH an amount equivalent to the undepreciated value of capital assets for which the operator has been funded or reimbursed through Medicaid rate adjustments or otherwise funded or reimbursed from State sources for purposes of improvement or transformation. Both provisions could have significant implications for transactions involving nursing homes at a time when the State is also proposing substantial cuts to Medicaid payments to such facilities (by 1% in 2020) as part of the effort to address a multi-billion dollar budget gap, clearly increasing the financial challenges facing the operators of such facilities.
The language of PHL §2803-x also raises many questions for operators, such as what is “common or familial ownership” in the context of a service provider, how and at what point an operator must disclose a potential real estate transaction before even a letter of intent is signed, and how the repayment obligation would be calculated in the event of a change of use of a facility. The industry will be looking to guidance from DOH on these and other issues, and operators are encouraged to confer with legal counsel to ensure compliance with the new requirements of the law.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26
Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases
In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.02.26
SBA OHA Confirms That the Submission Date for a Proposal with Pricing Controls Size Determination
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.01.26
California Court Upholds Insurer’s Duty to Defend After Covered Claim Is Dismissed
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.29.26
California Assembly Passes AB 1776, Sending Major Antitrust Bill to the Senate


