1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Biden Administration Directs Agencies to Implement and Enforce Environmental Justice Measures

Biden Administration Directs Agencies to Implement and Enforce Environmental Justice Measures

Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.01.21

On January 27, President Biden issued an executive order detailing the first steps to achieve his U.S. foreign and domestic policy on climate change, environmental justice (EJ), and clean energy. In particular, the executive order directs all federal agencies to make achieving EJ part of their missions and, most immediately, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)to “[s]trengthen enforcement of environmental violations with disproportionate impact on underserved communities. . .” To facilitate such a shift, the order further requires the deployment of new tools designed to identify and protect “fenceline” communities carrying a disproportionate burden of pollution and harmful environmental effects. These tools include:

  • Creating a “Geospatial Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool” (building upon EPA’s existing EJ Screen mapping tool);
  • Publishing EJ risk screening maps annually; and
  • Making environmental compliance and monitoring data available to the public in “real-time” in “frontline and fenceline” communities.

As a complement to enhanced EPA enforcement, the executive order directs the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to work with EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance in order to develop a “comprehensive environmental justice enforcement strategy,” aimed at ensuring “timely remedies for systemic environmental violations and contaminations and injury to natural resource.”

Implementation of President Biden’s executive order poses significant implications for the regulated community, particularly for those industries and those facilities operating within or in close proximity to historically underserved communities. By mapping EJ communities more vividly and by making real-time compliance data more readily available to the public, EPA, DOJ and citizen groups will be able to identify and target facilities for prioritized inspection, investigation, and ultimate enforcement (including through citizen suits) in order to protect fenceline communities. Companies should begin to assess and mitigate forthcoming EJ-driven enforcement risks.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights