Government Experience

  • Department of Defense—U.S. Air Force: Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Division, Headquarters Air Force Legal Operations Agency


  • Stanford University, B.A. political science
  • The George Washington University Law School, J.D.


  • Colorado
  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia


  • Mandarin

Skye Mathieson


Skye Mathieson is a partner in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring's Washington, D.C. office. He works with and advises clients from diverse industries on a wide array of matters, including contract performance disputes (CDA claims and equitable adjustments), cost allowability issues, defective pricing, fiscal law questions, prime-sub disputes, bid protests, internal investigations, and responding to DCAA audits. Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Skye spent several years as a trial attorney at the procurement litigation division of the Air Force Headquarters for Legal Operations, where he pioneered the seminal "Laguna Defense" that is now widely raised and litigated at the Boards of Contract Appeals.

Skye has extensive experience litigating cases before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA), the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and the Small Business Administration (SBA). Through this litigation, Skye has gained valuable experience in a wide variety of industries, such as aerospace (fighter jets, satellites, refueling tankers, simulators, and counter-measures), information technology and software development, construction, healthcare services, intelligence gathering, battlefield services and logistics, scrap disposal, base maintenance and repair contracts, and many others. 

Skye also has experience counseling and litigating on a broad range of legal issues, including defective pricing, cost disallowances, contract terminations, unique commercial item issues, constructive changes, differing site conditions, statute of limitations problems, CDA jurisdictional hurdles, contract fraud, Government superior knowledge, unabsorbed overhead and Eichleay damages, CICA stays and overrides, and small business issues. 

Having advocated and litigated on behalf of both the government and contractors, Skye has unique insights into both parties' perspectives that he leverages when exploring and negotiating settlements or other avenues for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Where settlements are not possible, Skye embraces opportunities for courtroom advocacy. He has significant trial experience examining both expert and fact witnesses on both direct and cross examination, as well as taking and defending depositions, drafting hearing briefs and dispositive motions, and managing millions of pages of document production.

Skye is an active member of the government contracts community. He is the editor-in-chief of the BCA Bar Journal, a quarterly publication of the Boards of Contract Appeals Bar Association, which allows him to work alongside judges, government attorneys, and in-house counsel in the production of each issue. He is also a member of the ABA Section of Public Contract Law.

Government Background and Experience

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Skye spent several years litigating government contract cases for the U.S. Air Force. He was lead counsel or co-counsel on approximately $2 billion worth of litigated matters, including numerous contract appeals at the ASBCA, bid protests at the GAO, and industry classification NAICS appeals at the SBA's Office of Hearing and Appeals. These cases include the $147 million F-22 Raptor "tail up" appeal, the high-visibility KC-X Tanker termination liability dispute, and the "rule of 2" clarifying Latvian Connection bid protest.    

In addition to his federal procurement experience, Skye has a background in trade and international procurement law. He spent several years working in China as a senior policy analyst jointly employed by the Beijing-based American Chamber of Commerce and the D.C.-based U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In that position, he advocated on behalf of the U.S. business community to both Chinese and U.S. lawmakers on issues of procurement policy, export controls and compliance, intellectual property laws, trade restrictions, and WTO obligations. He speaks Chinese. He has also held legal positions working on international trade litigation at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and at the Department of Commerce.

During law school, Skye served as senior managing editor of the Public Contract Law Journal. He also served as co-chair for the 2011 GW Government Contracts Moot Court Competition, where he co-wrote the Competition fact pattern, and he received the award for Overall Excellence when competing in the 2010 competition.

Representative Matters

Cost Disallowance & Defective Pricing Litigation (ASBCA) 

  • Successfully recovered $250+ million for aerospace contractor following CAS-related cost disallowance (matter of first impression).
  • Represented defense contractor in successfully obtaining no-cost Government withdrawal of large Defective Pricing (TINA) claim on the eve of trial.
  • Defended small IT contractor in recovering 100% of disputed costs following a FAR 31 cost disallowance of executive compensation and bonuses.
  • Defended major defense contractor in successfully resolving FAR 31 disallowance of employee morale and entertainment costs.
  • Defended small service contractor in recovering 100% of disallowed costs for alleged “labor mapping” violations (allegations that contractor’s employees or subs did not satisfy the contract’s experience or education requirements).
  • Successfully recovered $20+ million for technology contractor following CAS-related cost disallowance.
  • Defended aerospace contractor in successfully resolving FAR 31 disallowance of executive compensation costs.
  • Successfully defended IT contractor against "labor mapping" allegations that the contractor’s employees had failed to satisfy the contract’s experience or education requirements.
  • Successfully defended small service contractor in resolving FAR 31 disallowance of G&A elements and subcontract costs.
  • Successfully resolved $10+ million CAS-related disallowance of home office overhead costs for aerospace contractor.
  • Skye co-teaches (with David Bodenheimer) the annual, two-day Fed Pubs "Defective Pricing Seminar."

Contractor CDA Claims & Disputes (ASBCA, CBCA)

  • Successfully recovered 100% of unpaid invoices for small Iraq War contractor on matter of first impression rife with CDA jurisdictional obstacles.
  • Successfully represented small health care contractor in interpreting complex modifications to recover 100% of unpaid lease termination costs in connection with U.S. Army health care facility.
  • Represented contractor in defeating the government’s motion to stay ASBCA litigation, which the government sought due to related, ongoing litigation at U.S. District Court.
  • Successfully represented ship-building contractor in multimillion-dollar resolution of changes and delay claims with the U.S. Navy.
  • Negotiated successful settlement agreement with civilian agency to recover tens of millions of dollars in claims for changes, delays, and future work for major technology contractor.
  • Representing construction company in $20+ million litigation over differing site conditions, changes, and other claims.

Federal Court Litigation & Prime-Sub Disputes

  • Representing health care companies with $1+ billion in statutory and contract claims for unpaid risk-sharing payments (under the Affordable Care Act) at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Court of Federal Claims.
  • Successfully resolved $20+ million prime–sub dispute for major contractor arising under half-billion-dollar federal program through successful federal court litigation, arbitration, and mediation proceedings.
  • Represented technology contractor in multimillion-dollar prime–sub dispute in arbitration proceedings.

GAO Bid Protests

  • Successfully defended $158 million contract award for international geospatial intelligence services involving protest allegations of improper cost realism analysis, lack of common understanding, misleading discussions, and unequal technical evaluations. The Boeing Co., B-409941, B-409941.2, Sept. 18, 2014. 
  • Successfully represented technology contractor in protesting GSA FSS award involving relaxation of specifications, software end-user licenses, and awardee capabilities.

Default Terminations & Show Cause/Cure Notices

  • Successfully defended base-maintenance and repair contractor in responding to cure notice and resolving government threats of imminent default termination.
  • Represented Fortune 50 contractor in responding to cure notice and threat of termination with respect to half-billion-dollar commercial item health care IT program.
  • Successfully defended small construction company from default termination regarding overseas construction projects.

Representative Litigation for DoD

  • Government CDA claim alleging unlimited or government-purpose rights in technical data manuals for Italian-made combat aircraft that Congress transferred to the Afghan military. The litigation involved a matter of first impression – at any tribunal – of whether DoD's technical data rights clause (DFARS 252.227-13) is "mandatory" and thus "read-in" to covered contracts by function of the G.L. Christian Doctrine. Alenia North America, Inc., ASBCA No. 57935 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,724, resolved, ASBCA No. 57935, 2014 WL 7059879 (Dec. 4, 2014).
  • Matter-of-first-impression ASBCA litigation involving affirmative defenses of "prior material breach" (based on fraud convictions of employees imputed to the Prime Contractor) used to defeat the Contractor’s affirmative claims for unpaid invoices on a $350 million IDIQ Iraq reconstruction contract. Laguna Construction Co., ASBCA No. 58292, 13 BCA ¶ 35,315 (motion to stay based on ongoing fraud trial), resolved, Laguna Constr. Co. v. Carter, 828 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (affirming summary judgment on Skye’s affirmative defenses in a related ASBCA case (following DCMA’s amended Answer to incorporate those defenses)). 
  • ASBCA trial over a $9 million claim for unpaid licensing fees stemming from the government's use of contract-writing software. The four-day trial involved numerous witnesses and complex issues of intellectual property ownership, software escrow agreements, licensing rights, novations, and dueling interpretations of both contract modifications and GSA schedule orders. Distributed Solutions, Inc., ASBCA No. 57266, 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,704, aff’d, 2015 WL 5516256 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2015).
  • Bid protest in which GAO announced that overseas acquisitions are exempt from the mandatory "rule of 2" small business set-aside requirement. The GAO, after conducting a Chevron analysis, upheld the Air Force's interpretation of the regulations implementing the Small Business Act over the objections of the SBA, which had intervened in the litigation. Latvian Connection General Trading & Construction, LLC, B-408633, 2013 CPD ¶ 224, aff'd, B-408633.2.
  • Pre-award litigation over a partially classified $1 billion high-tech MASINT/GEOINT intelligence-gathering acquisition. The tribunal upheld the Air Force's selection of a "research and development" industry classification, enabling the procurement to proceed as a small-business set-aside. Evanhoe & Associates, LLC, SBA NAICS-5505, 2013 WL 5492238.
  • Multi-day ASBCA trial over a Type I & II Differing Site Conditions claim related to debris encountered in a post-hurricane cleanup at an Air Force base. Mylene Will Co., ASBCA 58154, 13 BCA ¶ 35,415.
  • Bid protest over $88 million contract for information technology engineering services issued by DoD's U.S. Transportation Command. The protester was excluded from the competitive range after several rounds of discussions and proposal revisions, leading to allegations of misleading discussions and unreasonable technical evaluation. CEdge Software Consultants, LLC, B-409380, 2014 CPD ¶ 107.
  • ASBCA appeal over $11 million in subcontract settlement costs stemming from the termination of a $250 million contract for retrofitting KC-10 refueling tankers. Post-hearing briefs involved issues of equitable estoppel, the government's limitation of funds defense, and whether the limitation of funds clause should be calculated at the task order, contract, or engineering assignment level. The Boeing Co., ASBCA 57409, 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,474.
  • Bid protest over $25 million small business set-aside contract for bomb-loading and related aerospace ground equipment. Protest involved allegations that the awardee's proposal indicated a lack of compliance with the 50 percent limitation on subcontracting and improper discussions. L&G Technology Services, Inc., B-408080.2, 2014 CPD ¶ 47.
  • CDA claim involving allegations of mutual mistake and $2.5 million in reliance-incurred upgrades to telecommunications infrastructure. Bluebird Communications, Inc., ASBCA 58379, 13 BCA ¶ 35,369.
  • ASBCA appeal involving a commercial item contract that was terminated for cause, the contractor's claims for unpaid invoices stemming from the termination, and attendant jurisdictional issues related to the monetary claims. United Healthcare Partners, Inc., ASBCA 58123, 13 BCA ¶ 35,277.
  • CDA claim for $767,000 in pre-contract information technology services based on a first-impression interpretation of a 2011 Supreme Court decision regarding equitable tolling and its impact on jurisdictional filing requirements. Waterstone Environmental Hydrology & Engineering, Inc., ASBCA 57557, 12-1 BCA ¶ 35,028.
  • ASBCA appeal involving the interpretation of FAR 52.217-8 as it related to $292,000 in additional costs arising out of the Air Force's unilateral extension of deliveries for concrete bomb targets. APAC-Southeast, Inc., n/k/a Oldcastle Southern Group, ASBCA 58057, 12-2 BCA ¶ 35,155.
  • ASBCA litigation over unpaid invoices, delay damages, and differing site conditions – followed by a default termination and claim for reprocurement – of a construction and well-drilling SABER contract. The claims and defenses involve issues of standby and excusable delay, conflicting contract terms, and waiver of completion dates. MIC/CCS, Joint Venture, ASBCA 58023, 2014 WL 3821354 (July 22, 2014).

Representative Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) for DoD

  • Successful ADR negotiation and win-win resolution of the high-visibility $147 million F-22 Raptor litigation at the ASBCA. The dispute turned on whether the DoD had sufficiently satisfied several contract triggers that would permit avoidance of $147 million in final-production-lot "tail up" costs (2012). 
  • Successful ADR settlement of a multi-party, multi-mediator, multi-variable complex cost allowability dispute over the Air Force's 2008 termination of a $1.6 billion contract for KC-X refueling tankers (2012).
  • Successful ADR after a multi-day ASBCA trial over construction delay claims, unabsorbed overhead/Eichleay damages, dueling expert accounting witnesses, and the government's FAR 31 costs disallowances of direct and indirect costs. Ford Construction Co., ASBCA 57822 et al. (2012).
  • Successful settlement of a $24 million ASBCA quantum appeal over lost profits – from unexercised option years and the denial of a fair opportunity to compete for task order awards – flowing from the government's breach (10-1 BCA ¶ 34,397) of a $350 million 8(a) multiple award ID/IQ contract. HMR Tech2, ASBCA 57464 (2012).
  • Successful ADR settlement of $2.5 million CDA claim for alleged government-directed changes to contract specifications for the construction of hyperbaric research altitude chambers. Environmental Tectonics Corp., ASBCA 58278, 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,598.
  • Innovative, successful resolution of non-monetary claims for adjustment or reconsideration of negative CPARS ratings, arising from an Air Force base operations and maintenance contract (2012). 


Speeches & Presentations


Client Alerts & Newsletters

Press Coverage

Firm News & Announcements

January 9, 2023 Crowell & Moring Elects 16 New Partners, Promotes Five to Senior Counsel, and 25 to Counsel
April 28, 2020 Maine Community Health Options Wins U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Enforcing Government Payment Obligation Under Affordable Care Act ‘Risk Corridor’ Cases
February 22, 2019 Law360 Names Crowell & Moring's Government Contracts Group a "Practice Group of the Year" for the Ninth Consecutive Year
September 7, 2018 LITIGATION NOTE: Crowell & Moring Succeeds in First Affordable Care Act Cost Sharing Reduction Case
January 9, 2017 Crowell & Moring Elects Six New Partners and Promotes 19 Associates to Counsel
January 9, 2015 Crowell & Moring's Government Contracts Group Named to Law360's "Practice Groups of the Year" for Fifth Consecutive Year