Photograph of Skye Mathieson

Government Experience

  • Department of Defense—U.S. Air Force: Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Division, Headquarters Air Force Legal Operations Agency


  • Stanford University, B.A. political science
  • The George Washington University Law School, J.D.


  • Colorado
  • District of Columbia


  • Mandarin
Skye Mathieson, Counsel Washington, D.C.
Phone: +1 202.624.2606
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004-2595

Skye Mathieson is a counsel in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring's Washington, D.C. office. He works with and advises clients from diverse industries on a wide array of matters, including bid protests, contract performance claims/disputes, and internal investigations and audits. Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Skye spent several years as a trial attorney at the procurement litigation division of the Air Force Headquarters for Legal Operations.  

Skye has extensive experience litigating cases before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and the Small Business Administration (SBA). Through this litigation, Skye has gained valuable experience in a wide variety of industries, such as intelligence gathering, construction, production of advanced fighter jets and refueling tankers, healthcare services, information technology and software, battlefield services, aircraft counter-measures and simulators, satellite launch vehicles, base maintenance contracts, and many others. 

Skye also has experience counseling and litigating on a broad range of legal issues, including contract terminations, cost allowability, commercial item contracts, unabsorbed overhead/Eichleay damages, contract changes, differing site conditions, statutes of limitation, contract fraud, CICA stays and overrides, and small business issues. 

Having advocated and litigated on behalf of both the government and contractors, Skye has unique insights into both parties' perspectives that he leverages when exploring and negotiating settlements or other avenues for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Where settlements are not possible, Skye embraces opportunities for courtroom advocacy. He has significant trial experience examining both expert and fact witnesses on both direct and cross examination, as well as taking and defending depositions, drafting hearing briefs and dispositive motions, and managing millions of pages of document production.

Representative Litigation:

  • Successfully defended $158 million contract award for international geospatial intelligence services involving protest allegations of improper cost realism analysis, lack of common understanding, misleading discussions, and unequal technical evaluations. The Boeing Co., B-409941, B-409941.2, Sept. 18, 2014.

Skye is an active member of the government contracts community. He is the editor-in-chief of the BCA Bar Journal, a quarterly publication of the Boards of Contract Appeals Bar Association, which allows him to work alongside judges, government attorneys, and in-house counsel in the production of each issue. He is also a member of the ABA Section of Public Contract Law.

In addition to his federal procurement experience, Skye has a background in trade and international procurement law. He spent several years working in China as a senior policy analyst jointly employed by the Beijing-based American Chamber of Commerce and the D.C.-based U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In that position, he advocated on behalf of the U.S. business community to both Chinese and U.S. lawmakers on issues of procurement policy, export controls and compliance, intellectual property laws, trade restrictions, and WTO obligations. He speaks Chinese. He has also held legal positions working on international trade litigation at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and at the Department of Commerce. 

Government Background and Experience

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Skye spent several years litigating government contract cases for the U.S. Air Force. He was lead counsel or co-counsel on approximately $2 billion worth of litigated matters, including numerous contract appeals at the ASBCA, bid protests at the GAO, and industry classification NAICS appeals at the SBA's Office of Hearing and Appeals. These cases include the $147 million F-22 Raptor "tail up" appeal, the high-visibility KC-X Tanker termination liability dispute, and the "rule of 2" clarifying Latvian Connection bid protest.    

Representative Litigation for DoD:

  • ASBCA trial over a $9 million claim for unpaid licensing fees stemming from the government's use of contract-writing software. The four-day trial involved numerous witnesses and complex issues of intellectual property ownership, software escrow agreements, licensing rights, novations, and dueling interpretations of both contract modifications and GSA schedule orders. Distributed Solutions, Inc., ASBCA No. 57266, 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,704, aff’d, 2015 WL 5516256 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2015).
  • Bid protest in which GAO announced that overseas acquisitions are exempt from the mandatory "rule of 2" small business set-aside requirement. The GAO, after conducting a Chevron analysis, upheld the Air Force's interpretation of the regulations implementing the Small Business Act over the objections of the SBA, which had intervened in the litigation. Latvian Connection General Trading & Construction, LLC, B-408633, 2013 CPD ¶ 224, aff'd, B-408633.2.
  • Government CDA claim alleging unlimited or government-purpose rights in technical data manuals for Italian-made combat aircraft that Congress transferred to the Afghan military. The litigation involves a matter of first impression – at any tribunal – of whether DoD's technical data rights clause is "mandatory" and thus "read-in" to covered contracts by function of the G.L. Christian Doctrine. Alenia North America, Inc., ASBCA No. 57935 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,724.
  • Pre-award litigation over a partially classified $1 billion high-tech MASINT/GEOINT intelligence-gathering acquisition. The tribunal upheld the Air Force's selection of a "research and development" industry classification, enabling the procurement to proceed as a small-business set-aside. Evanhoe & Associates, LLC, SBA NAICS-5505, 2013 WL 5492238.
  • Multi-day ASBCA trial over a Type II Differing Site Conditions claim related to debris encountered in a post-hurricane cleanup at an Air Force base. Mylene Will Co., ASBCA 58154, 13 BCA ¶ 35,415.
  • Bid protest over $88 million contract for information technology engineering services issued by DoD's U.S. Transportation Command. The protester was excluded from the competitive range after several rounds of discussions and proposal revisions, leading to allegations of misleading discussions and unreasonable technical evaluation. CEdge Software Consultants, LLC, B-409380, 2014 CPD ¶ 107.
  • ASBCA appeal over $11 million in subcontract settlement costs stemming from the termination of a $250 million contract for retrofitting KC-10 refueling tankers. Post-hearing briefs involved issues of equitable estoppel, the government's limitation of funds defense, and whether the limitation of funds clause should be calculated at the task order, contract, or engineering assignment level. The Boeing Co., ASBCA 57409, 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,474.
  • Bid protest over $25 million small business set-aside contract for bomb-loading and related aerospace ground equipment. Protest involved allegations that the awardee's proposal indicated a lack of compliance with the 50 percent limitation on subcontracting and improper discussions. L&G Technology Services, Inc., B-408080.2, 2014 CPD ¶ 47.
  • ASBCA litigation over unpaid invoices on a $350 million Iraq reconstruction ID/IQ contract that involved allegations of subcontract bid-rigging and kickback fraud. Laguna Construction Co., ASBCA 58292, 13 BCA ¶ 35,315.
  • CDA claim involving allegations of mutual mistake and $2.5 million in reliance-incurred upgrades to telecommunications infrastructure. Bluebird Communications, Inc., ASBCA 58379, 13 BCA ¶ 35,369.
  • ASBCA appeal involving a commercial item contract that was terminated for cause, the contractor's claims for unpaid invoices stemming from the termination, and attendant jurisdictional issues related to the monetary claims. United Healthcare Partners, Inc., ASBCA 58123, 13 BCA ¶ 35,277.
  • CDA claim for $767,000 in pre-contract information technology services based on a first-impression interpretation of a 2011 Supreme Court decision regarding equitable tolling and its impact on jurisdictional filing requirements. Waterstone Environmental Hydrology & Engineering, Inc., ASBCA 57557, 12-1 BCA ¶ 35,028.
  • ASBCA appeal involving the interpretation of FAR 52.217-8 as it related to $292,000 in additional costs arising out of the Air Force's unilateral extension of deliveries for concrete bomb targets. APAC-Southeast, Inc., n/k/a Oldcastle Southern Group, ASBCA 58057, 12-2 BCA ¶ 35,155.
  • ASBCA litigation over unpaid invoices, delay damages, and differing site conditions – followed by a default termination and claim for reprocurement – of a construction and well-drilling SABER contract. The claims and defenses involve issues of standby and excusable delay, conflicting contract terms, and waiver of completion dates. MIC/CCS, Joint Venture, ASBCA 58023, 2014 WL 3821354 (July 22, 2014).

Representative Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) for DoD:

  • Successful ADR negotiation and win-win resolution of the high-visibility $147 million F-22 Raptor litigation at the ASBCA. The dispute turned on whether the DoD had sufficiently satisfied several contract triggers that would permit avoidance of $147 million in final-production-lot "tail up" costs (2012). 
  • Successful ADR settlement of a multi-party, multi-mediator, multi-variable complex cost allowability dispute over the Air Force's 2008 termination of a $1.6 billion contract for KC-X refueling tankers (2012).
  • Successful ADR after a multi-day ASBCA trial over construction delay claims, unabsorbed overhead/Eichleay damages, dueling expert accounting witnesses, and the government's FAR 31 costs disallowances of direct and indirect costs. Ford Construction Co., ASBCA 57822 et al. (2012).
  • Successful settlement of a $24 million ASBCA quantum appeal over lost profits – from unexercised option years and the denial of a fair opportunity to compete for task order awards – flowing from the government's breach (10-1 BCA ¶ 34,397) of a $350 million 8(a) multiple award ID/IQ contract. HMR Tech2, ASBCA 57464 (2012).
  • Successful ADR settlement of $2.5 million CDA claim for alleged government-directed changes to contract specifications for the construction of hyperbaric research altitude chambers. Environmental Tectonics Corp., ASBCA 58278, 14-1 BCA ¶ 35,598.
  • Innovative, successful resolution of non-monetary claims for adjustment or reconsideration of negative CPARS ratings, arising from an Air Force base operations and maintenance contract (2012). 

Skye is a 2011 graduate of The George Washington University Law School, where he served as senior managing editor of the Public Contract Law Journal. He also served as co-chair for the 2011 GW Government Contracts Moot Court Competition, where he co-wrote the Competition fact pattern, and he received the award for Overall Excellence when competing in the 2010 competition.


Admitted to practice: Colorado, District of Columbia, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Highlights, News & Knowledge

Speeches & Presentations


Client Alerts & Newsletters

In the News

Firm News & Announcements

Jan.09.2017 Crowell & Moring Elects Six New Partners and Promotes 19 Associates to Counsel
Jan.09.2015 Crowell & Moring's Government Contracts Group Named to Law360's "Practice Groups of the Year" for Fifth Consecutive Year