Michael H. Jacobs
Overview
Michael H. Jacobs is a co-chair of Crowell & Moring's Patent Prosecution Group. He focuses on patent, trademark, trade secret, and copyright infringement litigation, post-grant patent proceedings, intellectual property portfolio management, patent procurement, counseling, and licensing.
Career & Education
- Villanova University, B.E.E., Presidential Scholar, Electrical Engineering, 1984
- Villanova University, M.S.E.E., Electrical Engineering, 1987
- Yale University, M.S., Engineering and Applied Science, 1989
- Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., 1996
- District of Columbia
- Virginia
- Pennsylvania
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Michael's Insights
Firm News | 1 min read | 07.09.25
Tahirih Justice Center Honors Crowell & Moring with Pro Bono Team of the Year Recognition
Washington – June 5, 2025: Tahirih Justice Center honored Crowell & Moring with the Pro Bono Team of the Year recognition at the annual Journey to Justice: Honoring Resilience, Championing Change event, held on May 22 in Washington, D.C.
Event | April 18, 2023
Speaking Engagement | April 18, 2023
"Cyber Laws at a Glance," 9th Annual Cybersecurity Conference for Executives, Baltimore, MD.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.16.23
Open Questions Add Uncertainty to Scope and Impact of New Trade Secret Law
Representative Matters
- LifeNet Health v. Life Cell Corp., No. 2:13-cv-00486 (E.D. Virginia): Represented plaintiff LifeNet in patent-infringement action involving soft-tissue grafts. Jury awarded LifeNet over $34 million; decision affirmed on appeal.
- Beckmann v. Gandhi, Interference No. 105,822 (PTAB), No. 2015-1765 (Fed. Cir.): Representing junior party Beckmann (on behalf of Daimler AG) in patent interference; case is currently on appeal.
- Bandl-Konrad v. Gandhi, Interference No. 105,839 (PTAB), No. 2014-1087 (Fed. Cir.): Represented junior party Bandl-Konrad (on behalf of Daimler AG) in patent interference. Obtained judgment in Bandl-Konrad’s favor in PTAB; prevailed on appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
- GE Lighting Solutions, LLC. v. Farlight, LLC, IPR 2014-00323 (PTAB): Represented petitioner GE Lighting Solutions in inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,220,959.
- Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Leica Camera AG and Leica Camera Inc., Nos. 8:12-cv-1153-ODW-MRW and 8:12-cv-1677-ODW-MRW (C.D. California): Represented Leica Camera defendants in a patent infringement action related to digital cameras. Secured dismissal of initial case under 35 U.S.C. § 299.
- E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Kolon Industries, Inc., et al., No. 3:09-cv-58 (E.D. Virginia). Represented plaintiff DuPont in case alleging misappropriation of over 100 trade secrets relating to KEVLAR® fiber technology in one of the largest trade secret misappropriation cases in the United States. Obtained a $919 million verdict against Kolon for the theft of KEVLAR® technology after a seven-week jury trial held in Richmond, Virginia.
- Wix Filtration Corp. LLC v. Purolator Filters NA LLC, No. 3:11-CV-289 (W.D. North Carolina): Represented defendant Purolator in patent-infringement action involving automotive air filters.
- Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. Canon U.S.A., Inc., et al., No. 1:08-CV-1009 (E.D. Virginia); No. 2010-1002 (Fed. Cir.). Represented Canon entities in patent-infringement action involving fax modem technology. Won on summary judgment in district court; judgment affirmed by the Federal Circuit.
- Flashpoint Technology, Inc. v. Leica Camera AG, No. 08-00139 (D. Delaware). Represented Leica entities in action involving camera technology.
- In re Certain Machine Vision Software, Machine Vision Systems, and Products Containing Same, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-2666, and Cognex Corp. v. Fuji America Corp., No. 08-10857 (D. Massachusetts). Represented Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Fuji America Corp. in actions involving software for machine-vision systems.
- Linex v. Nortel et al., No. 05-80300 (S.D. Florida). Representing defendant in patent infringement action involving distributed telecommunications network using spread-spectrum modulation.
- Nextel Communications v. Motorola, Opposition Nos. 91/161,817 and 91/164,353 (TTAB). Represented telecommunications company in trademark oppositions relating to use and distinctiveness of sound marks. Decisions issued in Nextel's favor in both matters.
- SomaLogic, Inc. v. Santa Coloma, Interference No. 105,493 (BPAI). Represented patent applicant in interference directed to methods of obtaining aptamers.
- ZymoGenetics v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Interference No. 105,433 (BPAI). Represented patent applicant in interference directed to fibroblast mitogenesis.
- Rossin v. Kanno, Interference Nos. 105,402 and 105,512 (BPAI). Represented Hitachi, Ltd. in interferences directed to abatement of perfluorinated compounds.
- Johnson v. Heine, Interference No. 105,310 (BPAI). Represented Unaxis Balzers AG in interference directed to color-separation technology for video displays.
- Rowells v. Vichinsky, Interference No. 105,518 (BPAI). Represented Mann & Hummel GmbH in interference directed to fuel rail for intake manifold of internal combustion engine.
Michael's Insights
Firm News | 1 min read | 07.09.25
Tahirih Justice Center Honors Crowell & Moring with Pro Bono Team of the Year Recognition
Washington – June 5, 2025: Tahirih Justice Center honored Crowell & Moring with the Pro Bono Team of the Year recognition at the annual Journey to Justice: Honoring Resilience, Championing Change event, held on May 22 in Washington, D.C.
Event | April 18, 2023
Speaking Engagement | April 18, 2023
"Cyber Laws at a Glance," 9th Annual Cybersecurity Conference for Executives, Baltimore, MD.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.16.23
Open Questions Add Uncertainty to Scope and Impact of New Trade Secret Law
Insights
Litigation Forecast 2016: What Corporate Counsel Need to Know for the Coming Year
|01.19.16
a Crowell & Moring LLP publication
Recent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 21
|11.01.00
International Legal Strategy, pp. 84-88
Recent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 6
|08.01.99
International Legal Strategy, pp. 82-87
Now It's Easier to Tell No Tales from Japan
|04.12.99
Legal Times Special Report on Intellectual Property, pp. 25-29
Parametric Modeling of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
|03.01.89
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-36, pp. 392-403
Practices
- IP Transactions and Diligence
- Patent Prosecution
- Intellectual Property Litigation
- Litigation and Trial
- IP Prosecution and Portfolio Management
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark Counseling and Litigation
- Post-Grant Proceedings
- U.S. ITC Section 337
- Patent Litigation
- Intellectual Property
- Design Protection
- Brand Protection
- Copyright Counseling and Litigation
- Israel Practice
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- Life Sciences — Intellectual Property
Industries
Michael's Insights
Firm News | 1 min read | 07.09.25
Tahirih Justice Center Honors Crowell & Moring with Pro Bono Team of the Year Recognition
Washington – June 5, 2025: Tahirih Justice Center honored Crowell & Moring with the Pro Bono Team of the Year recognition at the annual Journey to Justice: Honoring Resilience, Championing Change event, held on May 22 in Washington, D.C.
Event | April 18, 2023
Speaking Engagement | April 18, 2023
"Cyber Laws at a Glance," 9th Annual Cybersecurity Conference for Executives, Baltimore, MD.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.16.23
Open Questions Add Uncertainty to Scope and Impact of New Trade Secret Law