Tyler J. Piper

Associate

Overview

Tyler Piper is an associate in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. Office.

Tyler represents and counsels contractors on a diverse array of issues related to contract disputes and contract administration. Tyler earned his J.D. from the George Washington University Law School, where he completed a concentration in government contracts and was a senior editor of the Public Contract Law Journal. While in law school, Tyler served as an intern at the General Services Administration and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Career & Education

|
    • U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
      Intern, Office of Inspector General, 2022
    • General Services Administration
      Intern, GSA Acquisition Policy Division, 2021
    • U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
      Intern, Office of Inspector General, 2022
    • General Services Administration
      Intern, GSA Acquisition Policy Division, 2021
    • Rowan University, B.A., 2020
    • The George Washington University Law School, J.D., 2023
    • Rowan University, B.A., 2020
    • The George Washington University Law School, J.D., 2023
    • District of Columbia
    • District of Columbia

Tyler's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 01.23.24

Contractor Discovers the High Cost of Misrepresenting a Material Fact: Summary Judgment Denied in Part

On December 19, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Utah denied summary judgment in part to Vanderlande Industries (Vanderlande), holding that a reasonable jury could find that Vanderlande negligently misrepresented the viability of subcontractor Ludvik Electric Co.’s (Ludvik) pass-through claims during the parties’ settlement negotiations over the claims. ...

Tyler's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 01.23.24

Contractor Discovers the High Cost of Misrepresenting a Material Fact: Summary Judgment Denied in Part

On December 19, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Utah denied summary judgment in part to Vanderlande Industries (Vanderlande), holding that a reasonable jury could find that Vanderlande negligently misrepresented the viability of subcontractor Ludvik Electric Co.’s (Ludvik) pass-through claims during the parties’ settlement negotiations over the claims. ...