1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |501(c)(4) HOA to Pay Over $2M to Resolve FCA Allegations in Connection with PPP Loan

501(c)(4) HOA to Pay Over $2M to Resolve FCA Allegations in Connection with PPP Loan

Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.05.24

The San Diego Union-Tribune reports that a homeowners association (HOA) in California has reached an agreement with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to resolve allegations that the HOA obtained approximately $1.5 million in loans through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) that the HOA was not entitled to receive due to its status as a 501(c)(4) organization.  The HOA reportedly will pay $2,037,451 to resolve the allegations.  Of that amount, $244,494 will go to Wade Riner—the relator who initiated the action by filing a complaint under seal pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA).  According to the Tribune’s reporting, Riner has filed dozens of similar FCA suits across the country.

Indeed, this settlement appears to be just the tip of the iceberg.  In the past few months, three other FCA complaints filed by Riner have come out from under seal, naming some 75 different 501(c)(4) organizations as defendants.  In one of the cases, the DOJ elected to intervene as to four of the named defendants although the settlement amount is not yet public.

In prior alerts (see here and here), we have discussed how serial relators have been a defining feature of qui tam enforcement in cases alleging COVID-19 relief fraud.  These frequent filers have brought complaints based upon publicly available information about PPP loan recipients.  Prior complaints by serial relators have focused on recipients that received duplicate PPP loans or recipients that failed to comply with some of the more technical requirements associated with the second round of PPP funding.  In light of the recently unsealed complaints, it is clear that 501(c)(4) entities—such as private clubs and HOAs—are among the loan recipients now squarely in the crosshairs of serial relators.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26

New Jersey Takes Aim at Algorithmic and Surveillance Pricing: What Landlords and Retailers Need to Know About the FAIR Act and the Fair Price Protection Act

On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context....