Sharmistha Das
Overview
Sharmi Das’ experience at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), the White House, the U.S. Senate, and private practice positions her to guide clients through regulatory challenges, government-facing issues, and scrutiny from Congress and other oversight bodies. Sharmi has handled dozens of congressional inquiries and managed a program that developed hundreds of regulatory actions relating to homeland security matters, including technology, cybersecurity, contracts and grants, intelligence, health, and immigration. She participated in hundreds of policy discussions at the White House and DHS on high-profile issues that were often in the headlines, including domestic and international crises and emergencies.
Career & Education
- Department of Homeland Security
Deputy Chief of Staff, 2023–2025 - Department of Homeland Security
Deputy General Counsel, 2021–2023 - Office of the Vice President
White House, Associate Counsel, 2022–2023 - Office of U.S. Senator Kamala Harris
Senator Kamala Harris, Senior Counsel, 2019–2021
- Department of Homeland Security
- Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., cum laude, 2014
- Yale University, B.A., political science with distinction, 2009
- District of Columbia
- New York
- Supreme Court of the United States
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Law Clerk, Department of Justice, 2013
- Bengali
- French
Sharmistha's Insights
Webinar | 12.10.25
In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.
Speaking Engagement | 11.21.25
Publication | 11.14.25
Three Steps Tech Companies Can Take Today To Prepare To Ride A Blue Wave In 2026
Insights
Three Steps Tech Companies Can Take Today To Prepare To Ride A Blue Wave In 2026
|11.14.25
Washington Technology
The Decline of Deference: Is the Supreme Court Pruning Back the Chevron Doctrine?
|09.30.15
Trends, ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter
- |
09.24.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
Coming Soon: “Drone & Order” – A series on FAA rulemaking, BVLOS, and the future of UAS
|08.28.25
Crowell & Moring’s Transportation Law: Moving Forward
Meet the New Nationwide Injunction. Same as the Old Nationwide Injunction.
|08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
- |
08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
- |
08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
US Tariff Enforcement Risk Continues to Rise as DOJ Assigns Unit to Criminally Prosecute Violators
|07.14.25
Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Law
- |
12.16.14
Crowell & Moring's Government Contracts Legal Forum
Sharmistha's Insights
Webinar | 12.10.25
In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.
Speaking Engagement | 11.21.25
Publication | 11.14.25
Three Steps Tech Companies Can Take Today To Prepare To Ride A Blue Wave In 2026


