Nayar Islam

Associate

Overview

Nayar Islam has experience working on a variety of antitrust-related matters. Nayar has represented clients in litigation proceedings before state and federal courts and in government investigations. In her litigation practice, Nayar has represented both defendants and plaintiffs and has worked on antitrust class actions involving price fixing and no-poach allegations. She also maintains an active pro bono practice; one of her matters includes successfully winning immigration asylum for her client.

During law school, Nayar was the executive editor of the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal. She was also on the board of the South Asian Law Students Association, served as a peer mentor, and worked as a teaching assistant for the undergraduate class, Law and the U.S. Constitution in Global History. 

Career & Education

    • University of Southern California, Gould School of Law, J.D., 2022
      Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal: executive editor
    • Loyola Marymount University, B.A., summa cum laude, political science
    • University of Southern California, Gould School of Law, J.D., 2022
      Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal: executive editor
    • Loyola Marymount University, B.A., summa cum laude, political science
    • California
    • California

Nayar's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.17.26

U.S. Supreme Court Will Consider Challenge to Contempt Order in Federal Antitrust and Unfair Competition Case

In the underlying litigation, Epic Games alleged that Apple violated antitrust and unfair competition laws by engaging in anti-steering behavior related to purchases on Apple’s in-app payment system. Apple received a percentage of payments made through this system, and Epic Games argued that Apple prohibited app developers from informing users about alternative payment options.  ...

Nayar's Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.17.26

U.S. Supreme Court Will Consider Challenge to Contempt Order in Federal Antitrust and Unfair Competition Case

In the underlying litigation, Epic Games alleged that Apple violated antitrust and unfair competition laws by engaging in anti-steering behavior related to purchases on Apple’s in-app payment system. Apple received a percentage of payments made through this system, and Epic Games argued that Apple prohibited app developers from informing users about alternative payment options.  ...