Matthew F. Ferraro
Overview
Matthew F. Ferraro is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Group, where he helps clients address complex regulatory matters at the intersection of advanced technology, national security, and crisis management. He advises leading organizations on high-impact matters related to artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies, cyberattacks, domestic and international privacy compliance, internal investigations, foreign direct investment reviews, and high-stakes crises.
Career & Education
- Department of Homeland Security
- Senior Counselor for Cybersecurity and Emerging Technology to the Secretary, 2023–2025; Executive Director of the Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Board, 2024–2025
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
- Intelligence Officer, 2009–2010
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Executive Assistant to the Deputy Director for Policy, Plans, and Requirements, 2007–2009
- Special Assistant to the Chief of Staff, 2006–2007
- Department of Homeland Security
- Adjunct Professor of Law, George Mason University, 2022–Present
- Stanford Law School, J.D., with pro bono distinction, 2013
- University of Cambridge, MPhil, historical studies, with distinction, 2005
- Yale University, B.A., history, with distinction, 2004
- District of Columbia
- California
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- The Hon. John G. Koeltl, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2015–2016
- The Hon. A. Raymond Randolph, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 2014–2015
- The Hon. Jay S. Bybee, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2013–2014
- Life Member, Council on Foreign Relations, 2025–Present (Term Member, 2017–2023)
- Senior Fellow, National Security Institute, 2018–Present
Matthew's Insights
Webinar | 10.16.25
The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:
Speaking Engagement | 09.09.25
"Crowell Atelier: Networking Breakfast for Luxury Clients," Crowell & Moring Seminar, New York, NY.
Press Coverage | 08.30.25
Actor Will Smith’s New Videos Raise Fresh Concerns About The Use Of AI
Press Coverage | 08.07.25
Federal Courts Said to Suffer Hack Similar to Earlier Breach
Insights
Trump’s ‘truth seeking’ AI Executive Order Is A Complex, Expensive Policy, Experts Say
|08.01.25
News from the States
Fastest 5 Minutes: DOJ Guidance re DEI, White House AI Action Plan
|08.04.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
- |
08.01.25
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Legal Forum
Matthew's Insights
Webinar | 10.16.25
The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:
Speaking Engagement | 09.09.25
"Crowell Atelier: Networking Breakfast for Luxury Clients," Crowell & Moring Seminar, New York, NY.
Press Coverage | 08.30.25
Actor Will Smith’s New Videos Raise Fresh Concerns About The Use Of AI
Press Coverage | 08.07.25
Federal Courts Said to Suffer Hack Similar to Earlier Breach