Drake Morgan
Overview
Drake Morgan is an Antitrust and Competition Group counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, where he focuses on antitrust litigation, multijurisdictional merger control, and EU law. Drake is a member of Crowell & Moring’s Antitrust & Competition Digital Markets Working Group and Digital Platforms Sub-Team. Drake joined Crowell & Moring having previously practiced in Brussels as an EU competition lawyer, giving him years of experience with the competition laws of the U.S., the European Union, and other antitrust regimes worldwide.
Career & Education
- Wesleyan University, B.A., history, 2007
- The George Washington University Law School, J.D., with honors, 2012
- District of Columbia
- New York
- Brussels
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Drake's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.09.24
Eleven States Sue Asset Managers Alleging ESG Conspiracy to Restrict Coal Production
On November 27, 2024, a group of eleven state attorneys general (the “AGs”) sued three of the world’s largest asset managers (the “Asset Managers”), accusing them of anticompetitive stock acquisitions, deceptive asset management practices, and an antitrust conspiracy to restrict coal output. The states seek declaratory and injunctive relief including divestitures, as well as fines under state laws, although the allegations could provide a basis for follow-on private treble damages claims under the antitrust laws.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 09.24.24
ESG Opponents' Antitrust Accusations: Do They Make Sustainability Collaboration Dangerous?
Press Coverage | 07.03.23
Crowell & Moring's Pro Bono Fight to Free Crosley Green Faces 'Inconsistent' Parole Commission
Representative Matters
- Represented AT&T in the trial of its acquisition of Time Warner.
- Represented Humana in the trial of its proposed acquisition by Aetna.
- Represented a leading worldwide steel distributor in acquisition by a leading steel producer, obtaining merger control approvals in seven jurisdictions including the U.S., the European Union, Brazil, and China.
- Represented a leading worldwide steel equipment producer in the acquisition of a significant non-controlling minority shareholding in a competitor. Based on comprehensive multijurisdictional advice, the transaction was structured to permit implementation with the approval of only one merger control authority worldwide.
- Represented a regional steel distributor in the formation of a joint venture with a leading worldwide steel producer, obtaining European Commission merger approval after a simplified procedure.
- Advised the subject of a European Commission investigation on the laws and procedures governing follow-on damages litigation in several European and Middle Eastern jurisdictions.
- Provided an expert opinion on comparative antitrust laws governing the collective management of copyrights and related rights.
Drake's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.09.24
Eleven States Sue Asset Managers Alleging ESG Conspiracy to Restrict Coal Production
On November 27, 2024, a group of eleven state attorneys general (the “AGs”) sued three of the world’s largest asset managers (the “Asset Managers”), accusing them of anticompetitive stock acquisitions, deceptive asset management practices, and an antitrust conspiracy to restrict coal output. The states seek declaratory and injunctive relief including divestitures, as well as fines under state laws, although the allegations could provide a basis for follow-on private treble damages claims under the antitrust laws.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 09.24.24
ESG Opponents' Antitrust Accusations: Do They Make Sustainability Collaboration Dangerous?
Press Coverage | 07.03.23
Crowell & Moring's Pro Bono Fight to Free Crosley Green Faces 'Inconsistent' Parole Commission
Insights
The European Union
|02.01.14
Chambers Global Practice Guide: Merger Control 2014
Drake's Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.09.24
Eleven States Sue Asset Managers Alleging ESG Conspiracy to Restrict Coal Production
On November 27, 2024, a group of eleven state attorneys general (the “AGs”) sued three of the world’s largest asset managers (the “Asset Managers”), accusing them of anticompetitive stock acquisitions, deceptive asset management practices, and an antitrust conspiracy to restrict coal output. The states seek declaratory and injunctive relief including divestitures, as well as fines under state laws, although the allegations could provide a basis for follow-on private treble damages claims under the antitrust laws.
Client Alert | 10 min read | 09.24.24
ESG Opponents' Antitrust Accusations: Do They Make Sustainability Collaboration Dangerous?
Press Coverage | 07.03.23
Crowell & Moring's Pro Bono Fight to Free Crosley Green Faces 'Inconsistent' Parole Commission