Arkansas Takes Aim at PBM Ownership of Retail Pharmacies
What You Need to Know
Key takeaway #1
Arkansas passed legislation, effective January 1, 2026, that will limit PBM ownership of retail pharmacies within the state.
Key takeaway #2
The legislation has broad sweeping language, but it does not completely prohibit PBM ownership of pharmacies.
Key takeaway #3
PBMs and retail pharmacies should assess their exposure now and implement a compliance plan.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.25.25
On April 17, 2025, Arkansas recently became the first state to enact broad restrictions on pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”) owning retail pharmacies within the state.
Proponents of the law argue that it will improve patient access to fairly priced prescription drugs and curb anticompetitive business practices. But opponents contend it unfairly targets the nation’s largest PBMs—some of which operate pharmacies in Arkansas— and could disrupt patient access to affordable medications.
Although Arkansas is the first state to enact such comprehensive legislation restricting PBM ownership of pharmacies, it is not the first to take aim at the issue. Louisiana, for example, passed a law that prohibits PMBs from steering consumers to pharmacies the PBM has an ownership interest in, unless it obtains certain acknowledgements.[i] And several other states have also called for federal oversight or intervention on the issue. On April 14, a bipartisan group of 39 state attorneys general sent Congressional leadership a letter urging them to adopt national legislation similar to Arkansas’s.
Arkansas’s H.B. 1150 specifically prohibits a PBM from “acquir[ing]” a direct or indirect interest in, or otherwise “hold[ing],” an Arkansas retail pharmacy permit beginning January 1, 2026.[ii] The law effectuates this change through the state’s pharmacy permitting system by requiring the Arkansas Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) to “revoke or not renew” any current pharmacy permit held by a PBM on or after January 1, 2026.[iii]
There are two primary exceptions to this broad restriction. First, H.B. 1150 permits the Board to issue a “limited use permit” of no less than 90 days to pharmacies that would otherwise violate the law if the pharmacy meets a need “for rare, orphan, or limited distribution drugs.”[iv] Second, the Board can also extend or renew an existing permit for pharmacies that offer certain critical patient care services if the PBM is in the process of selling the pharmacy to an eligible entity.[v]
Holders of pharmacy permits issued before July 1, 2025 that will be affected by H.B. 1150 will receive written notice of cancellation. The Board is required to assess each active retail pharmacy permit in the state and send written notice to each permit holder it believes will violate H.B. 1150 by early October 2025.[vi] Permit holders that receive this notice are required to provide to notify patients and their prescribing providers by early November 2025 that the pharmacy can no longer dispense retail drugs to the patient.[vii] PBMs with pharmacies holding permits in Arkansas should lookout for notices from the Board, as that will trigger their obligation to notify patients.
Much remains uncertain about how H.B. 1150 will be implemented before its January 1, 2026 effective date. The future of PBM ownership of pharmacies in Arkansas will hinge on the Board’s forthcoming regulations. For example, the Board must establish the process and timeline for permit holders to request a “limited use permit” and the process for emergency determinations based on patient need.[viii] In the meantime, PBMs and their affiliated pharmacies should review their Arkansas operations, evaluate how the law applies to them, and develop compliance and operational strategies before the H.B. 1150 becomes effective.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
After hosting a series of workshops and issuing multiple rounds of materials, including enforcement notices, checklists, templates, and other guidance, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has proposed regulations to implement the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) (both as amended by SB 219), which require large U.S.-based businesses operating in California to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related risks. CARB also published a Notice of Public Hearing and an Initial Statement of Reasons along with the proposed regulations. While CARB’s final rules were statutorily required to be promulgated by July 1, 2025, these are still just proposals. CARB’s proposed rules largely track earlier guidance regarding how CARB intends to define compliance obligations, exemptions, and key deadlines, and establish fee programs to fund regulatory operations.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.17.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
Executive Order Tries to Thwart “Onerous” AI State Regulation, Calls for National Framework
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.17.25
The new EU Bioeconomy Strategy: a regulatory framework in transition




