Benjamin Geisel

Counsel | He/Him/His

Overview

Clients with EU and German competition law issues rely on Benjamin Geisel’s solution-oriented and pragmatic advice. He is especially well-known for his experience in managing international merger control proceedings and complex cartel investigations.

Benjamin is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Antitrust and Competition Group and is based in Brussels. He advises clients on all aspects of EU and German competition law, and his practice covers a broad range of sectors, including finance, technology, energy and chemicals.

Benjamin frequently represents clients before the European Commission and the German Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt).

Earlier in his career, Benjamin completed an internship with the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition. He also worked in the business development team of an e-commerce start-up company in Berlin.

Career & Education

|
    • International Business Development Specialist, DaWanda GmbH, 2012-2013
    • Second State Exam in law (Zweites Staatsexamen), Kammergericht Berlin, 2015
    • First State Exam in law (Erstes Staatsexamen), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2012
    • International Business Development Specialist, DaWanda GmbH, 2012-2013
    • Second State Exam in law (Zweites Staatsexamen), Kammergericht Berlin, 2015
    • First State Exam in law (Erstes Staatsexamen), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2012
    • Humboldt University of Berlin, 2012
    • King's College London, PGDip, EU Competition Law, 2016
    • Humboldt University of Berlin, 2012
    • King's College London, PGDip, EU Competition Law, 2016
    • Brussels
    • Berlin
    • Brussels
    • Berlin
    • Member of the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht, an association of German-speaking competition lawyers and economists.
    • Member of the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht, an association of German-speaking competition lawyers and economists.
    • German
    • English
    • Dutch
    • French
    • German
    • English
    • Dutch
    • French

Benjamin's Insights

Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.03.24

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation One Year On: An Effective Tool or Just More Red Tape?

Just over a year ago, the notification obligations under the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) became applicable. Since then, M&A transactions and bids for government contracts above certain thresholds must be notified to the European Commission. Pending the Commission’s review, the transaction cannot be completed, or the contract cannot be awarded. What lessons can be learned from the application of the FSR to date? Has the FSR proved to be an effective tool in leveling the playing field, or has its main effect been to burden companies with red tape, at the risk of discouraging investment in Europe?...

Representative Matters

  • Advised a global financial institution on several cartel investigations undertaken by the European Commission.
  • Advised a global private equity investor concerning the merger control aspects of the sale of a chemicals subsidiary, a transaction that included numerous vertical and conglomerate relationships between the parties, and a deal valued at approximately €4 billion.
  • Advised a global technology company in relation to the online advertising sector inquiry of the German Federal Cartel Office.
  • Advised a global insurance company in relation to the establishment of a multi-national insurance distribution cooperation project in Latin America.
  • Advised a German utilities company on the merger control aspects of its majority acquisition by another energy company in a hostile takeover. The deal was valued at approximately €2.3 billion.

Benjamin's Insights

Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.03.24

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation One Year On: An Effective Tool or Just More Red Tape?

Just over a year ago, the notification obligations under the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) became applicable. Since then, M&A transactions and bids for government contracts above certain thresholds must be notified to the European Commission. Pending the Commission’s review, the transaction cannot be completed, or the contract cannot be awarded. What lessons can be learned from the application of the FSR to date? Has the FSR proved to be an effective tool in leveling the playing field, or has its main effect been to burden companies with red tape, at the risk of discouraging investment in Europe?...

|

Benjamin's Insights

Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.03.24

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation One Year On: An Effective Tool or Just More Red Tape?

Just over a year ago, the notification obligations under the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) became applicable. Since then, M&A transactions and bids for government contracts above certain thresholds must be notified to the European Commission. Pending the Commission’s review, the transaction cannot be completed, or the contract cannot be awarded. What lessons can be learned from the application of the FSR to date? Has the FSR proved to be an effective tool in leveling the playing field, or has its main effect been to burden companies with red tape, at the risk of discouraging investment in Europe?...