Insights

Boston – October 15, 2025: Jeffrey S. Gleason, an accomplished first-chair trial attorney and former leader in the Civil Fraud Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, has joined Crowell & Moring as a partner, further bolstering the firm’s fast-growing and industry-leading Health Care Group.

Washington – September 24, 2025: Crowell & Moring today announced the arrival of two seasoned attorneys, Rachel Park and Jill Abrams, to its nationally recognized Health Care Group. Both join Crowell after more than two decades at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), where they served in various senior level positions across the department. The addition of Park and Abrams further strengthens the firm’s ability to advise sophisticated health care clients on complex regulatory, compliance, enforcement, and litigation matters. They join the firm as senior counsel in Washington, D.C.

On February 26, 2026, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee voted 22-1 to advance the Health Care Cybersecurity and Resiliency Act of 2026. Sponsored by a bipartisan group — led by HELP Committee Chair Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA); and Senators Mark Warner (D-VA), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), and John Cornyn (R-TX) — the bill represents perhaps the most significant federal legislative effort to overhaul health care cybersecurity since the passage of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act in 2009, and would compel health care companies to make major investments in cybersecurity.

On March 3, 2026, the Department of Labor (DOL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Department of the Treasury (TREAS) — collectively, the “Tri-Agencies” — published their fourth annual report to Congress on enforcement of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). The 2025 Report demonstrates a shift in approach by the Tri-Agencies in its tone and content and suggests that federal regulators, and the DOL in particular, are not as active as they previously were in MHPAEA enforcement. However, federal enforcement remains ongoing, and state enforcement of mental health parity laws continues to grow. Plans and issuers must continue to maintain comprehensive compliance processes and documentation for MHPAEA compliance.

A recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. 1st Choice Accident & Injury, LLC, No. 24-20275 (5th Cir. Feb. 24, 2026), offers important lessons for health care payors and other potential plaintiffs considering civil claims under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Although the Fifth Circuit’s decision focused on a procedural issue, the underlying case turned on a fundamental pleading failure: the plaintiff insurers did not adequately describe the fraudulent network they were suing as a RICO “enterprise.” The result was dismissal of a $14 million fraud case.

Join us for an interactive and educational event tailored for biotech leaders seeking to ensure security compliance while leveraging the power of Amazon Web Services (AWS). This session will dive into the critical elements of designing secure, scalable, and compliant systems for biotech operations, from research and development to clinical trials and beyond.

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:

On October 16, 2025, Partner Matthew F. Ferraro, Partner and CHS Managing Director Jason Johnson, and Counsels Jacob Canter and Anna Z. Saber hosted a webinar on the shifting dimensions of AI governance and regulation. They discussed federal policy, state laws, international efforts, and key court cases and how these many sources of regulation serve to fragment the AI compliance environment for businesses and how firms can respond. Click here to view the webinar on demand.

This podcast episode features the following speakers:

Click below to listen or access from one of these links: PodBean | SoundCloud | iTunes

In this episode, hosts Payal Nanavati and Megan Beaver speak with Linda Malek and Matthew F. Ferraro about the latest federal and state developments in artificial intelligence (AI) policy affecting health care. The conversation covers the Trump administration’s AI action plan and Executive Orders on AI, new industry-specific and comprehensive state laws, and enforcement trends, with a focus on how these changes impact the health care industry.