Insights

Professional
Practice
Industry
Region
Trending Topics
Location
Type

Sort by:

Firm News 6 results

Firm News | 7 min read | 06.04.26

Crowell & Moring Secures Top Rankings in Chambers USA 2026

Washington – June 4, 2026: Crowell & Moring earned 92 individual rankings for 81 attorneys, as well as 48 national and statewide practice area rankings, in the Chambers USA 2026 guide. The Chambers guide ranks the country’s top law firms and lawyers through in-depth research, client interviews, and feedback from attorneys at peer firms. 
...

Firm News | 2 min read | 11.05.25

Crowell & Moring Earns 58 Rankings in 2026 "Best Law Firms" Report

Washington – November 5, 2025: Crowell & Moring ranked nationally in 20 practice areas in the 2026 edition of Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms." In addition, the firm was ranked in 38 metropolitan categories. 
...

Firm News | 3 min read | 08.20.25

The Best Lawyers in America 2026 Recognizes 44 Crowell & Moring Attorneys

Washington – August 20, 2025: The 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® has recognized 44 Crowell & Moring lawyers as "Best Lawyers." 
...

Client Alerts 4 results

Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.22.25

Trump Issues Executive Order Directing Drastic Clampdown on Offshore Wind Leasing

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order directing the withdrawal of all areas on the Outer Continental Shelf —an expansive area of submerged land under federal control— from eligibility for offshore wind leasing. This Executive Order was one of several energy-related executive orders reportedly intended to increase oil and gas production and curtail the deployment of clean energy resources signed by Trump shortly following his inauguration. The Order is premised on stated concerns for meeting “the country’s growing demand for reliable energy,” maintaining a “robust fishing industry for future generations” and providing “low cost energy to [U.S.] citizens.”
...

Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.20.22

Small Changes to NEPA Rules Expected to Have Major Impacts on Federal Environmental Reviews of Infrastructure Projects

On April 20, the Biden Administration published final changes to the rules governing how federal agencies consider the environmental impacts of their proposed actions, returning to previous standards that required consideration of indirect and cumulative effects of a proposed action. Although the rule changes may appear minimal, encompassing modifications to two specific regulatory subsections and updates to two definitions, the changes could be significant in how agencies consider impacts on environmental justice communities or effects of climate change from proposed federal actions, including federal agency authorizations and approvals for energy, transportation, and other infrastructure projects. 
...

Client Alert | 7 min read | 07.15.15

Fish and Wildlife Service To Consider New Incidental Take Authorization Under Migratory Bird Treaty Act

Through a notice initiating the scoping process for environmental analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has announced its intent to consider a new permitting program (alongside other options) for oil and gas and other industry operators, offering first-of-its-kind authorization for "incidental take" of the multitude of bird species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA). See 80 Fed. Reg. 30,032 (May 26, 2015). As discussed further below, some industries and operators previously targeted for enforcement may view the new initiative as a significant step forward, providing the benefit of regulatory certainty on a variety of migratory bird hazards. At the same time, however, the announcement raises the specter of new, potentially burdensome administrative and operational hurdles for those who obtain MBTA incidental take authorization.  The announcement also has reignited debate over FWS's authority (or lack thereof) to regulate so-called "incidental" takes under the MBTA.
...

Press Coverage 1 result

Press Coverage | 10.02.14

Supreme Court Could Hear Challenge to EPA Rule on Emissions

The Indianapolis Star
Washington, D.C.-based partner and steering committee member of the Environment & Natural Resources Group, Kirsten L. Nathanson, discusses a challenge to a federal rule cutting toxic emissions from power plants, which is one of the issues facing the Supreme Court this term. The federal rule in question limits toxic pollution, such as mercury, from coal- and oil-fired power plants, and is being appealed but 23 states and industry groups. Nathanson argues that, "The regulated community believes it was completely irrational and inappropriate for EPA to ignore the high cost," adding, "we will see if the Supreme Court latches onto it."
...

Publications 3 results

Publication | 01.09.15

Developments in ESA Citizen Suits and Citizen Enforcement of Wildlife Laws

ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, Vol. 29, No. 3

Publication | 01.31.13

Litigation Forecast 2013: What Corporate Counsel Need to Know for the Coming Year

Crowell & Moring LLP publication

Webinars 2 results

Webinar | 01.12.23, 8:00 AM EST - 9:30 AM EST

What Will the New Year Bring for Government Contractors?

As 2023 rolls in, what changes can government contractors expect? What will be the focus of the US Government? How should contractors prepare?
...

Webinar | 03.24.21, 5:55 AM CDT - 6:40 AM CDT

2nd Energy and Environmental Law Conference

Partner Amanda Berman will be presenting the session "Regulatory Roulette: The State of Play Under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Other Major Environmental Statutes" at 10:45 am on Wednesday, March 24th.
...