Insights

New York – August 3, 2023: The Arab America Foundation named Crowell & Moring’s Randa Adra to its 40 Under 40 Class of 2023. The recognition is “a celebration of accomplished young Arab Americans… [who] have great achievements both in the workplace and in their communities.”

New York – July 28, 2023: Bloomberg Law recognized Crowell & Moring’s Randa Adra in its third annual edition of “They’ve Got Next: The 40 Under 40,” a special report that honors the accomplishments of outstanding young lawyers nationwide. Nominees were evaluated on a range of criteria including records of success for their clients, leadership skills, and pro bono service.

New York – June 22, 2023: The American Bar Association has recognized Crowell & Moring partner Randa Adra among its “On The Rise – Top 40 Young Lawyers” list. The program honors ABA young lawyers who “exemplify a broad range of high achievement, innovation, vision, leadership, and service to the profession and their communities.”

On December 15, 2022, in Raad v. Bank Audi SAL, Case No. 21-2612, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the Southern District of New York’s decision to dismiss the breach of contract case on forum non conveniens grounds. In its Summary Order, the Court of Appeals found that the forum selection clause in the General Agreement between the depositors and the bank did not contain language directing that Beirut courts have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising from their agreement. While this decision gives a glimmer of hope to these account holders, the Summary Order certainly does not ensure victory for the Raads just yet. Importantly, the ruling also does not have precedential effect, meaning it will provide limited support for others seeking to bring claims against Lebanese banks for refusing to release their funds. Nonetheless, this decision demonstrates that persons and entities with funds locked behind capital controls instituted unilaterally by Lebanese banks due to the ongoing Lebanese financial crisis may still have a path to redress in U.S. courts.

Can a party in an international arbitration compel a person in the United States to provide testimony or produce documents? For decades, the answer to this question has been “maybe, depending on where the person is located.” Today, the Supreme Court definitively and unanimously answered this question, and the answer may leave some pleased and others disappointed.

On March 31, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Badgerow v. Walters, ruling that federal courts may not “look through” to the underlying dispute to determine whether there is federal jurisdiction over requests to confirm or vacate arbitral awards under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”).  This decision establishes that petitions to confirm or vacate arbitral awards will be subject to a different, more traditional jurisdictional analysis⸺and are more likely to be heard in state court⸺than petitions to compel arbitration under Section 4 of the FAA, which instructs federal courts to employ the “look through” approach. See Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49, 50 (2009).

This panel will discuss key issues related to the appointment of minorities to international arbitral tribunals and diversity in international arbitration more generally, an issue that has received increasing attention following a petition by Jay-Z related to the lack of diversity in AAA arbitration. Young ICCA is a world-wide arbitration knowledge network for young practitioners and students. It aims to promote the use of arbitration by exposing new practitioners from all corners of the globe to the international practice of arbitration.

This panel will provide an update on issues related to current topics in arbitrating international disputes in MENA:

This webinar will discuss various new developments in International Disputes. Panelists will discuss Qatar's ratification of the Singapore Convention on Mediation and other emerging trends.