1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |What Not To Ask: The Rise of “Salary History Ban” Laws

What Not To Ask: The Rise of “Salary History Ban” Laws

Webinar | 08.24.17, 8:00 AM EDT - 9:00 AM EDT

Please join us for the next edition of Third Thursday - Crowell & Moring’s Employment Law Update, a webinar series dedicated to helping businesses stay on top of developing law and emerging compliance issues.


Several state and local jurisdictions, including New York City, D.C., and California, have enacted or proposed laws which would prohibit employers from asking applicants about their salary history. The laws, which are intended to promote pay equity by negating the effects of past pay discrimination, particularly against women, are part of a nation-wide trend: 18 other states have proposed bills, and more are likely to follow.


In this month’s program, our panelists will discuss the ins and outs of the laws in New York City, Delaware, Philadelphia, and Massachusetts, which will go into effect in the next year. We will also explore some of the open questions regarding employer compliance, including:

  • What does it mean to “prompt” an applicant to provide salary information? 
  • What changes should employers make to online applications? 
  • What can an employer ask of its third-party recruiters? 
  • How should employers address situations in which an applicant volunteers her prior salary? 

For more information, please visit these areas: Labor and Employment

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...