1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |WEBINAR: Trump’s "Two-for-One" Executive Order to Reduce Regulation – What Does it Mean for Industry? — C&M's First 100 Days Series

WEBINAR: Trump’s "Two-for-One" Executive Order to Reduce Regulation – What Does it Mean for Industry? — C&M's First 100 Days Series

Webinar | 03.02.17, 8:00 AM EST - 8:45 AM EST

On January 30, President Trump – acting on a campaign pledge – issued an Executive Order directing that for every new regulation issued by his Administration, the issuing agency will be required to repeal two other regulations (EO 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs”). The White House Office of Management and Budget followed up soon after with guidance on how the 2-for-1 EO will be implemented for the remainder of fiscal year 2017. But the big question on everyone’s mind remains: how will the Trump Administration ever be able to pull this off? This webinar will examine the 2-for-1 EO and offer commentary on how agencies might go about trying to comply.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The legal effect of an EO generally.
  • The scope of the 2-for-1 EO specifically.
  • Challenges agencies will face trying to comply with the 2-for-1 EO.
  • Opportunities for companies and associations with the Administration in light of the 2-for-1 EO.

For more information, please visit these areas: Administrative Law

Insights

Webinar | 12.10.25

Terminations, Stop Work Orders, and De-Scopes – The Latest Updates and Recovery Opportunities for USAID Contractors and Grant Recipients

In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.