1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The U.S. Response to China’s Theft and Acquisition of Trade Secrets

The U.S. Response to China’s Theft and Acquisition of Trade Secrets

Webinar | 09.29.20, 10:00 AM EDT - 11:00 AM EDT

There’s been an increase in the number of criminal prosecutions of trade secret theft under the Economic Espionage Act over the past several years, including the pursuit of those behind state-sponsored cyber intrusions as well as a renewed focus on insider cases involving both private sector companies and academic institutions.


According to a June 2018 report by the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, China's theft of American intellectual property costs between $225 billion and $600 billion annually. In late 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Security Division stood up the China Initiative, which aims in part to “identify priority trade secret theft cases, ensure that investigations are adequately resourced, and work to bring them to fruition in a timely manner and according to the facts and applicable law” and “develop an enforcement strategy concerning non-traditional collectors (e.g., researchers in labs, universities and the defense industrial base) that are being coopted into transferring technology contrary to U.S. interests.”


Among the DOJ’s many recent high-profile indictments under the China Initiative are an 11-count indictment charging two Chinese nationals with stealing trade secrets and intellectual property from several U.S. biotech firms, including potential COVID-19 research, and an indictment of a Harvard University professor regarding his alleged participation in China’s Thousand Talents Program.


Join Crowell & Moring partners Caroline Brown, experienced national security attorney, and Jim Stronski, seasoned trade secrets litigator, to learn:

  • The drivers incentivizing trade secret theft;
  • Enforcement trends in China-related criminal trade secret cases;
  • Other mechanisms the U.S. government uses to combat foreign acquisition and theft of trade secrets;
  • How China’s commitments in the 2020-China Phase One trade agreement impact trade secret protection;
  • What these developments mean for companies operating in the U.S. and China; and
  • Best practices to help protect your company’s trade secrets.

For more information, please visit these areas: White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement, National Security, Trade Secrets

Contact

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...