Internet Disparagement: Protecting Your Reputation When a Disgruntled Employee Trashes Your Company Online
Webinar | 09.28.17, 8:00 AM EDT - 9:00 AM EDT
Please join us for the next edition of Third Thursday - Crowell & Moring’s Employment Law Update, a webinar series dedicated to helping businesses stay on top of developing law and emerging compliance issues.
In the Internet age, employers face new challenges when employees post disparaging (and possibly unlawful) material about the company online. Employees may mask their identities behind the anonymity of the internet. It is difficult (but not always impossible) to unmask them. But unmasking employees to pursue legal action against them may not be the best strategy. The First Amendment can protect anonymous speech. When employees disparage or defame the company online, they are often protected by a variety of federal and state laws that can limit the company’s legal options. And, as suggested by the recent “Google manifesto,” companies must address other considerations when employees post material online that may require the employer to take disciplinary action against the employee.
Employee internet attacks on your company’s reputation require quick thinking and a game plan. Our webinar will explore key issues in this area, including:
- Steps for responding to anonymous internet disparagement,
- The impact of employment law whistleblower protections,
- Employer obligations under anti-harassment and related laws,
- State free speech laws,
- The role of post-employment covenants,
- The First Amendment and anonymous speech, and
- NLRA protections for employees’ internet speech.
This webinar is scheduled for Thursday, September 28, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern. We hope that you can join us and participate in a lively discussion of these issues by our panel of Crowell & Moring lawyers with particular experience in these issues.
For more information, please visit these areas: Labor and Employment
Contact
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 12.10.25
In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.
Webinar | 11.24.25
AI in the Workplace: EU Rules for When Humans and Bots Team Up


