Increasing Public and Regulatory Scrutiny of PFAS
Webinar | 04.04.19, 9:00 AM EDT - 10:30 AM EDT
Last month the U.S. EPA hosted simultaneous press conferences in every EPA Region to roll out an Action Plan for addressing growing public concern and potential human health risks posed by polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment and household products. As part of the Action Plan, EPA set a goal of proposing drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for two PFAS constituents, PFOA and PFOS, by the end of 2019. U.S. EPA’s widely publicized announcement signaled that EPA has elevated its priority for addressing the PFAS problem, and highlights the public and political pressure facing EPA to take action. While the federal regulatory process will still require years, EPA announced real-time initiatives to give communities and state regulators more insight into where PFAS may be an issue.
These changes, combined with a growing list of States (e.g., New York State has published notice of intent to establish MCLs for PFOA and PFOS of 10 part per trillion each, in 2019), indicate that the U.S. is transitioning to a regulatory framework where PFAS will be classified as hazardous constituents that need to be remediated in environmental media (e.g., soil and water supplies).
This webinar will present an overview of current and expected future PFAS regulations and their impact on business operations, including transactional due diligence, permitting, remediation, and risk communication and tort litigation.
Panelists
- Jennifer Giblin, Senior Counsel, Crowell & Moring
- Peter Condron, Partner, Crowell & Moring
- Neal Durant, Senior Principal Consultant, Geosyntec
- Seth Kellogg, Senior Geologist, Geosyntec
For more information, please visit these areas: Environment and Natural Resources, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
Contact
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 12.10.25
In 2025, the U.S. Government’s policy statements and Executive Orders have had far-reaching impacts for government contractors and grant recipients. Although terminations, stop work orders, and de-scopes have affected private companies, non-profits, and universities doing business across multiple agencies, the U.S. Government’s policies relating to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has caused particular confusion and uncertainty relating to performance, compliance, and contractual procedure. Key questions have included the potential impacts of official and less formal communications from the U.S. Government, procedural issues arising from the move of certain functions to the U.S. Department of State, and the effect of various pending litigations. As businesses and organizations plan for 2026, the importance of preserving their rights and maximizing potential recovery opportunities remains paramount.
Webinar | 11.24.25
AI in the Workplace: EU Rules for When Humans and Bots Team Up

