Increasing Public and Regulatory Scrutiny of PFAS
Webinar | 04.04.19, 9:00 AM EDT - 10:30 AM EDT
Last month the U.S. EPA hosted simultaneous press conferences in every EPA Region to roll out an Action Plan for addressing growing public concern and potential human health risks posed by polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment and household products. As part of the Action Plan, EPA set a goal of proposing drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for two PFAS constituents, PFOA and PFOS, by the end of 2019. U.S. EPA’s widely publicized announcement signaled that EPA has elevated its priority for addressing the PFAS problem, and highlights the public and political pressure facing EPA to take action. While the federal regulatory process will still require years, EPA announced real-time initiatives to give communities and state regulators more insight into where PFAS may be an issue.
These changes, combined with a growing list of States (e.g., New York State has published notice of intent to establish MCLs for PFOA and PFOS of 10 part per trillion each, in 2019), indicate that the U.S. is transitioning to a regulatory framework where PFAS will be classified as hazardous constituents that need to be remediated in environmental media (e.g., soil and water supplies).
This webinar will present an overview of current and expected future PFAS regulations and their impact on business operations, including transactional due diligence, permitting, remediation, and risk communication and tort litigation.
Panelists
- Jennifer Giblin, Senior Counsel, Crowell & Moring
- Peter Condron, Partner, Crowell & Moring
- Neal Durant, Senior Principal Consultant, Geosyntec
- Seth Kellogg, Senior Geologist, Geosyntec
For more information, please visit these areas: Environment and Natural Resources, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
Contact
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 03.12.26
The federal government has identified purported ‘waste, fraud, and abuse’ in small business programs as a major focus of its current enforcement efforts. As it relates to federal procurement, we have seen audits and investigations rolled out not only of active participants in the Small Business Administration’s 8(a) Business Development Program but also reviews of various types of small business contracts (such as 8(a) sole source and set-aside awards, preference-based awards, and small business set-aside awards over particular values). Join Crowell & Moring as we discuss what aspects of contract performance and teaming arrangements are being scrutinized (e.g., size/status eligibility, limitations on subcontracting compliance, reasonableness of market rates, etc.) and how these considerations can impact both small government contractors holding the prime contracts under review and their subcontractors.
Webinar | 03.02.26

