1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |GIDEP Reporting for All - The New FAR Counterfeit Parts and Nonconformance Reporting Requirement

GIDEP Reporting for All - The New FAR Counterfeit Parts and Nonconformance Reporting Requirement

Webinar | 12.17.19, 8:00 AM EST - 9:30 AM EST

Register

Please join us on December 17th for a special webinar presentation addressing the new FAR requirement that will change your supply chain compliance program (or compel you to start one).


Counterfeit parts reporting is no longer restricted to DoD contractors or to electronic parts. A new FAR requirement going into effect December 23, 2019, will require all contractors to participate in Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (“GIDEP”) reporting for critical counterfeit or suspect counterfeit parts, as well as certain nonconforming parts and other items. Moreover, contractors will be required to monitor the GIDEP database to identify and investigate any reported counterfeit or nonconforming parts in the contractor’s supply chain.  


This webinar will specifically address:

  • What products and contract types are (and are not) subject to the new reporting requirement
  • What qualifies as a counterfeit or suspect counterfeit part
  • What qualifies as nonconforming parts
  • Who must report and who is exempt
  • Reporting timelines and process 
  • Best practices for updating your supply chain compliance program to incorporate this new reporting mandate
We will provide a certificate of attendance and other materials to use in seeking continuing education credits.

For more information, please visit these areas: Government Contracts

Contact

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...

View All Insights