GAR Interactive: BITs
Webinar | 01.21.21, 8:45 AM EST - 9:45 AM EST
Partner Ian Laird will serve as a judge for the session "The GAR Interactive Debate" at 1:45 pm. In this interactive session, we will hear junior practitioners debate the motion: ‘This house believes that big tech will embrace investment arbitration.’
Following this, the panel will weigh-in on what they have just heard, before choosing which side to support and giving reasons for their decisions.
Judges:
- Ian Laird, Crowell & Moring LLP
- Jennifer Permesly, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
- Nicole Silver, GreenbergTraurig
- Can Yeginsu, 4 New Square Chambers
Debators:
- Jennifer Ivers, White & Case
- Karthik Reddy, Allen & Overy
For more information, please visit these areas: International Dispute Resolution
Participants
Insights
Webinar | 10.16.25
The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:
Webinar | 09.29.25
False Claims Act and Customs Enforcement—What You Need to Know
Webinar | 09.25.25
