1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Corporate Counsel Litigation Forum: A Peer-to-Peer Conversation on Trends in Affirmative Recovery

Corporate Counsel Litigation Forum: A Peer-to-Peer Conversation on Trends in Affirmative Recovery

Webinar | 10.06.15, 10:00 AM EDT - 11:00 AM EDT

This Corporate Counsel Litigation Forum webinar will feature a panel of in-house attorneys who are leaders in affirmative recovery. Panelists will address trends for corporations and institutions to recover overcharges resulting from price-fixing and other antitrust violations, as well as recoveries relating to health care, financial instruments, supply chain, commercial contracts, tax, and international trade.

The panel will engage in discussion and take questions on a range of topics, including:

  • Recent developments and trends for affirmative recovery programs.
  • Class action settlements and opt-out litigation.
  • Portfolio review and development of a pipeline of opportunities.
  • Best practices and lessons learned. 

The panel will be moderated by Crowell & Moring recovery attorneys. Working with these and other in-house affirmative recovery programs, Crowell & Moring has distributed over $1 billion to clients in recent years. Long at the leading edge of recovery and opt-out litigation, Crowell & Moring has been proactively identifying and successfully pursuing recovery opportunities for corporations for more than two decades.

Panelists

  • Daniel Sasse, Crowell & Moring
  • Deborah Arbabi, Crowell & Moring
  • Bill Moore, HP
  • Amy Scholl, Luxottica


For more information, please visit these areas: Corporate and Transactional, Litigation and Trial, Recovery

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...

View All Insights