1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“COVID-19 Stimulus Law”) Section 3610 — Seeking Relief When Contractor Employees Cannot Perform as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“COVID-19 Stimulus Law”) Section 3610 — Seeking Relief When Contractor Employees Cannot Perform as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Webinar | 03.30.20, 9:00 AM EDT - 10:00 AM EDT

Register

The Coronavirus pandemic continues to cause disruptions across nearly all industrial sectors, including the government contracting industry. As contractors attempt to respond to challenges in providing support to government customers, meeting contract and staffing requirements, and adhering to contract terms and a constantly shifting landscape, Congress has provided an additional avenue of relief to certain contractors dealing with COVID-19 related impacts. On March 27, Congress passed the COVID-19 Stimulus Law. Section 3610 of the legislation provides assistance in connection with contractor employees that (1) cannot perform work on certain sites during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) cannot telework because their job duties cannot be performed remotely.

 


During this webinar, Crowell & Moring’s government contracts lawyers will discuss the new law and its implications for contractors seeking relief for COVID-19 related performance issues.


For more information, please visit these areas: Government Contracts

Contact

Participants

Insights

Webinar | 10.16.25

The Artificial Intelligence Agenda from Capitol Hill to State Capitals: Where We Are and Where We Are (Probably) Going

The landscape of AI governance and regulation is shifting. Following the release of the White House’s “America’s AI Action Plan” in July 2025 and the President’s signing of related Executive Orders, the White House has emphasized (at least rhetorically) a preference for innovation, adoption, and deregulation. But that does not tell the entire story. The Administration remains committed to exercising a heavy hand in AI, including by banning the U.S. government’s procurement of so-called “woke AI,” intervening in the development of data centers and the export of the AI technology stack, imposing an export fee for certain semiconductors to China, and assuming a stake in a U.S. semiconductor company. State legislatures are also racing to implement their own regulations, particularly around AI’s use in critical areas, such as healthcare, labor and employment, and data privacy. The many sources of regulation raise the specter of a fragmented compliance environment for businesses. This webinar will delve into the Administration’s AI strategy, going beyond the headlines to analyze:...

View All Insights