1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Court Issues Final Consent Judgment on United-Sierra Acquisition

Court Issues Final Consent Judgment on United-Sierra Acquisition

Firm News | 2 min read | 10.17.08

Washington, D.C. – On September 24, 2008, the federal district court in Washington, D.C. entered a final consent judgment resolving antitrust allegations concerning UnitedHealth Group's acquisition of Sierra Health Services. Consistent with the judgment's terms, United had already divested its individual Medicare Advantage product line in the Las Vegas, Nevada area shortly after the acquisition closed earlier this year. Crowell & Moring attorneys, led by partner Art Lerner, represented United and Sierra in the court's Tunney Act review of the proposed final judgment.

The court rejected arguments by the American Medical Association and the Service Employees International Union, submitted under the Tunney Act review process for antitrust consent decrees, that the consent judgment was inadequate and that they should be permitted to present further evidence to the court in additional hearings. The judge ruled that the divestiture requirements of the consent judgment sufficiently addressed the Department of Justice's complaint allegation that the acquisition would harm competition in an alleged Medicare Advantage market.

As for the objectors' claims that the acquisition would create undue power for United in the purchase of health care providers' services and in the sale of commercial health insurance products in Las Vegas, the court explained that its review of the consent judgment's adequacy "is limited to the scope of the complaint" and that the Department of Justice had not alleged such harms in its complaint. In oral argument, the court also noted that the Nevada Insurance Commissioner and the Nevada Attorney General also did not challenge the merger on those grounds.

After entry of the judgment in Washington, D.C., the federal district court in Las Vegas, Nevada on October 8, 2008 approved a similar stipulated final judgment resolving allegations by the Nevada Attorney General concerning alleged loss of competition in Medicare Advantage products.

Crowell & Moring LLP is an international law firm with more than 450 lawyers practicing in litigation, antitrust, government contracts, health care, corporate, intellectual property and a variety of other practice areas. More than two-thirds of the firm's attorneys regularly litigate disputes on behalf of domestic and international corporations, start-up businesses, and individuals. Crowell & Moring's extensive client work ranges from advising on one of the world's largest telecommunications mergers to representing governments and corporations on international arbitration matters. Based in Washington, D.C., the firm also has offices in New York, London, Brussels, Los Angeles, and Irvine, CA.

Insights

Firm News | 2 min read | 08.21.25

Latinvex Names Crowell & Moring to List of Latin America's Top Law Firms of 2025

Washington – August 21, 2025: Latinvex has named Crowell & Moring as one of Latin America’s Top International Law Firms of 2025. The firm is listed among the top 50 global firms ranked for their legal work in Latin America....