1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Third Thursday--C&M's April Labor & Employment Update: Comcast v. Behrend

Third Thursday--C&M's April Labor & Employment Update: Comcast v. Behrend

Event | 04.18.13, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

On Thursday April 18, at 12:00 pm eastern,a cross-disciplinary team of Crowell & Moring class action trial lawyers will discuss the significance of the Supreme Court’s March 27 decision in Comcast v. Behrend


Please join us for this edition of Crowell & Moring’s Third Thursday webinar series.  Our panel will debate the importance of Comcast v. Behrend on class action litigation generally, and discuss specific implications for Labor & Employment, Antitrust, Consumer Class Action and other big ticket cases.


Please click here for a copy of the presentation and white paper. 


Please click here for a recording of the webinar.

For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, Product Risk Management, Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation, Labor and Employment, Class Action Defense

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.