1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |ABA - Securities Fraud 2014

ABA - Securities Fraud 2014

Event | 11.13.14 - 11.14.14, 12:00 AM UTC - 12:00 AM UTC

Each year this National Institute draws elite officials from both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for an exclusive educational and professional forum to examine current legal and ethical issues relating to securities fraud.


Program highlights include: 


    - Creative Discovery Tactics in Defending Securities Fraud Allegations
    - Compliance Chiefs: The Role of the Internal Watchdog
    - Future of Private Plan Securities (including the recent Stanford Supreme Court decision)
    - Too Big to Fail: If All Else Fails, Do Guilty Pleas Matter?
    - Sez Who? SEC Targeting Attorneys Who Allegedly Obstruct Enforcement Investigations (ETHICS)


Tom Hanusik is the Committee Co-Chair and a speaker.  Andy Liu and Dan Zelenko are also speaking.


For more information, please visit these areas: Litigation and Trial, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement

Insights

Event | 02.20.25

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today

Has the Buss Stopped? Recoupment Today: In 1997, the California Supreme Court decided Buss v. Superior Court. In Buss, the court concluded that a liability insurer that defended a mixed action could seek reimbursement from the insured for the defense costs associated with the claims that were not even potentially covered. Since then, numerous courts have held that insurers are entitled to recoup their defense costs associated with uncovered claims or causes of action. On the other hand, a significant number of courts have rejected insurers’ right to recoupment, at least in the absence of a policy provision granting the insurer that right. Some commentators have even suggested that the current judicial trend might be away from permitting insurers to recoup their defense costs. Is that correct? Has the Buss stopped? This panel of coverage experts will analyze insurers’ claimed right to recoupment today, and offer their perspectives on what the law on recoupment should perhaps be and might be in the future.