USOPC Ramping Up Trademark Enforcement as Paris Summer Olympics Approach
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.25.24
With opening ceremonies set to begin, the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (the “USOPC”) sent a strong reminder that it strictly enforces its trademarks and protects against ambush-style marketing. On July 19, the USOPC sued sports beverage company Prime Hydration, LLC (“Prime Hydration”), which was founded in 2022 by YouTubers KSI and Logan Paul, for allegedly infringing USOPC’s trademarks with Olympic-themed advertising. Filed in the District of Colorado,[1] the complaint alleges that Prime Hydration improperly used phrases such as “Olympic,” “Olympian,” “Team USA,” and “Going for Gold” on advertising and packaging for its beverages featuring Olympic basketball athlete Kevin Duran. An example of the alleged infringement is shown below.

The complaint notes that for the Summer Olympic Games, which begin in Paris on July 26, the USOPC has given Coca-Cola the exclusive right to use “Olympic” and “Team USA” on beverages sold in the United States. USOPC, which funds and trains U.S. teams in Olympic and related games, relies on licensing agreements as a primary source of financing, and the value of the Coca-Cola agreement stems in large part from its exclusivity.
Notably, the lawsuit includes claims under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, 36 U.S.C. § 220506(a) (the “Ted Stevens Act”). The Ted Stevens Act grants the USOPC the exclusive right to commercially exploit marks and symbols related to the Olympics in the United States, such as the five interlocking rings, the word “Olympic,” and any word, symbol, or other indicator representing an association with the USOPC. The Ted Stevens Act allows the USOPC to enforce these rights in federal court and seek remedies under the Lanham Act. In fact, the Ted Stevens Act is arguably even broader than the Lanham Act because it does not require the USOPC to prove there is a likelihood of consumer confusion.
The USOPC has long aggressively protected against any use of Olympic symbols and provides guidelines about their use to the public here. Clients are advised to send out reminders to their marketing teams, in particular their social media teams, about the USOPC’s strict enforcement of its rights. Our team regularly drafts such advisory notices for clients and counsels clients about navigating advertising during the Olympic Games.
[1] See United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee v. Prime Hydration LLC, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, No. 24-cv-0200.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.29.26
On 8 October 2026, Crowell & Moring, King's College London, and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University co-hosted the 7th EU Competition Law Conference at De Warande in Brussels. Mark Meador, Commissioner at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), delivered the opening keynote address, followed by four panels bringing together practitioners, regulators, academics, and in-house counsel to discuss the latest developments in EU, UK, and US competition law enforcement. Among other things, the panels examined algorithmic pricing; the European Commission's (Commission) new guidelines on exclusionary abuses under Article 102 TFEU (Article 102 Guidelines); the impact of dominant positions in merger reviews; and lessons from the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.29.26
What University Licensors Should Learn From TexasLDPC v. Broadcom
Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.28.26
Debriefing to Dead Briefing: How to Avoid Dismissal by Identifying “Required” Debriefings
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.27.26


