USOPC Ramping Up Trademark Enforcement as Paris Summer Olympics Approach
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.25.24
With opening ceremonies set to begin, the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (the “USOPC”) sent a strong reminder that it strictly enforces its trademarks and protects against ambush-style marketing. On July 19, the USOPC sued sports beverage company Prime Hydration, LLC (“Prime Hydration”), which was founded in 2022 by YouTubers KSI and Logan Paul, for allegedly infringing USOPC’s trademarks with Olympic-themed advertising. Filed in the District of Colorado,[1] the complaint alleges that Prime Hydration improperly used phrases such as “Olympic,” “Olympian,” “Team USA,” and “Going for Gold” on advertising and packaging for its beverages featuring Olympic basketball athlete Kevin Duran. An example of the alleged infringement is shown below.

The complaint notes that for the Summer Olympic Games, which begin in Paris on July 26, the USOPC has given Coca-Cola the exclusive right to use “Olympic” and “Team USA” on beverages sold in the United States. USOPC, which funds and trains U.S. teams in Olympic and related games, relies on licensing agreements as a primary source of financing, and the value of the Coca-Cola agreement stems in large part from its exclusivity.
Notably, the lawsuit includes claims under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act, 36 U.S.C. § 220506(a) (the “Ted Stevens Act”). The Ted Stevens Act grants the USOPC the exclusive right to commercially exploit marks and symbols related to the Olympics in the United States, such as the five interlocking rings, the word “Olympic,” and any word, symbol, or other indicator representing an association with the USOPC. The Ted Stevens Act allows the USOPC to enforce these rights in federal court and seek remedies under the Lanham Act. In fact, the Ted Stevens Act is arguably even broader than the Lanham Act because it does not require the USOPC to prove there is a likelihood of consumer confusion.
The USOPC has long aggressively protected against any use of Olympic symbols and provides guidelines about their use to the public here. Clients are advised to send out reminders to their marketing teams, in particular their social media teams, about the USOPC’s strict enforcement of its rights. Our team regularly drafts such advisory notices for clients and counsels clients about navigating advertising during the Olympic Games.
[1] See United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee v. Prime Hydration LLC, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, No. 24-cv-0200.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.05.26
The Office of Management and Budget issued on May 29, 2026 a Proposed Rule that would significantly revise the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, potentially impacting the full lifecycle of federal grants, cooperative agreements and other forms of financial assistance, from pre-award merit review through post-award administration and termination. These proposed changes are designed to implement the President’s policy priorities, executive actions related to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) activities, and Executive Order No. 14332, Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking (EO 14332).
Client Alert | 5 min read | 06.04.26
EU Pay Transparency Directive: The Transposition Deadline is Looming — What Now?
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.04.26
Surveillance Pricing Update: California’s Sweeping AB 2564 Passes Assembly and Heads to Senate
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.04.26
USTR Proposes Sweeping Tariffs as Part of Section 301 Forced Labor Import Enforcement Investigation


